
Originally Posted by
Cali512
If there was a single video or stat out there that showed Edmunds being a good to great LB, you would be an absolute idiot to not provide us with it. So the fact that you havent, proves to me that it is just not out there
notty, if there was any stat/video on the internet that proved Edmunds is a good LB, YOU WOULD BE AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT for not providing us with it. It has been 2 years and I have seen you post nothing.
The best way to describe you is like a ghost “expert”. You have no real proof of the ghost, you cant provide hard data on the ghost, but you believe in the ghost because of so called “ghost experts”
there are hundreds of stats and videos that prove to us that Fred Werner/Bobby Wagner/Lavonte David are great LBs. its not hard to find, you shouldnt need to rely on anonymous quotes to prove they are good.
Look in the mirror buddy, YOU yourself cant find actual proof of edmunds being good, you dismiss all the stats and videos of Edmunds being bad, you have been searching the internet for 2 years and have found zero stats or videos defending your opinion on Edmunds.
If we were in court, you wouldve been found guilty within 5 minutes of the jury deciding. If we were on TV arguing, you would be a meme right now, if you were running for president, you wouldnt of made it past the first debate
When arguing a point, its best to provide facts/videos/statistics. Normally if your unable to find such things, you start realizing that you may be off.
I could provide more stats and video that would argue that Mac Jones was the best QB in the nfl last season, than you could just saying Edmunds is a good LB. Thats how far off your analysis is. I could honestly probably do a better argument that Mac Jones/Justin Fields/Zach Wilson/ and Trevor Lawrence are the 4 best QBs in the nfl right now, by just cherry picking random stats, lack of good players, age, and just random nit picky stats, that would make more sense than you trying to argue that Edmunds is good. Im trying to explain how far off your argument is and how far away you are from proving anything
Honestly, your so bad at this, that I could make a much better argument that Edmunds is a good LB than you are. I actually know of some hidden stats, could maybe find a few videos, or at least put some effort into making an argument for edmunds than you are. Its not that Edmunds is so atrocious that its impossible to defend him, its more that you are so ridiculously bad at defending him, that no one can take you seriously. I would do a better job sarcastically defending him than you are. That is how bad you are at this
- - - Updated - - -
If there was a single video or stat out there that showed Edmunds being a good to great LB, you would be an absolute idiot to not provide us with it. So the fact that you havent, proves to me that it is just not out there
notty, if there was any stat/video on the internet that proved Edmunds is a good LB, YOU WOULD BE AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT for not providing us with it. It has been 2 years and I have seen you post nothing.
The best way to describe you is like a ghost “expert”. You have no real proof of the ghost, you cant provide hard data on the ghost, but you believe in the ghost because of so called “ghost experts”
there are hundreds of stats and videos that prove to us that Fred Werner/Bobby Wagner/Lavonte David are great LBs. its not hard to find, you shouldnt need to rely on anonymous quotes to prove they are good.
Look in the mirror buddy, YOU yourself cant find actual proof of edmunds being good, you dismiss all the stats and videos of Edmunds being bad, you have been searching the internet for 2 years and have found zero stats or videos defending your opinion on Edmunds.
If we were in court, you wouldve been found guilty within 5 minutes of the jury deciding. If we were on TV arguing, you would be a meme right now, if you were running for president, you wouldnt of made it past the first debate
When arguing a point, its best to provide facts/videos/statistics. Normally if your unable to find such things, you start realizing that you may be off.
I could provide more stats and video that would argue that Mac Jones was the best QB in the nfl last season, than you could just saying Edmunds is a good LB. Thats how far off your analysis is. I could honestly probably do a better argument that Mac Jones/Justin Fields/Zach Wilson/ and Trevor Lawrence are the 4 best QBs in the nfl right now, but just cherry picking random stats, lack of good players, age, and just random nit picky stats, that would make more sense than you trying to argue that Edmunds is good. Im trying to explain how far off your argument is and how far away you are from proving anything
Honestly, your so bad at this, that I could make a much better argument that Edmunds is a good LB than you are. I actually know of some hidden stats, could maybe find a few videos, or at least put some effort into making an argument for edmunds than you are. Its not that Edmunds is so atrocious that its impossible to defend him, its more that you are so ridiculously bad at defending him, that no one can take you seriously. I would do a better job sarcastically defending him than you are. That is how bad you are at this