Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31

Thread: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

  1. #21
    Registered User Forward_Lateral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The Great White North
    Posts
    29,804
    Thanks
    185
    Thanked 8,062 Times in 4,266 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    118

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quote Originally Posted by kgun12 View Post
    What about D Williams, he knows the offense?
    I'm pretty sure he was brought up earlier this year, and someone mentioned he's retired and doing something outside of football now.

  2. Post thanked by:

    kgun12 (12-02-2022)

  3. #22
    Acid Douching Asswipe OpIv37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    101,023
    Thanks
    16,035
    Thanked 26,299 Times in 13,729 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    285

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quote Originally Posted by ghz in pittsburgh View Post
    The more likely approach is exactly what they did last night: Allen had 33 drop backs and 8 carries. Cook/Singletary/Hines had a combined 29 carries. Almost a 4 to 3 ratio. If the running backs can be effective, less demand on Allen in drop backs. And it should open up doors for play-action, which is not really featured that much yesterday.

    No RPO yesterday.

    I think that's the way to go instead of raiding practice squads for pass-pros.

    Anyone noticed that yesterday is the least Allen centric offense the Bills run this year? Heck they even converted 3rd and 1s without Allen, a touchdown on 3rd and 1. Allen made 1 or 2 "wow" throws, that's it.
    Fair point, but can/will they actually do it? We've been hearing since 2020 of how they need a more balanced attack that doesn't rely on Allen so much, with results that are mixed at best. There have even been times where we had early success with the RB's but Daboll/Dorsey went away from it for some inexplicable reason. I don't know that I completely trust the O to stick with the run game.

  4. #23
    Registered User Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    9,191
    Thanks
    420
    Thanked 3,414 Times in 1,996 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quote Originally Posted by cookie G View Post
    well yeah. But Doyle and Quenssenberry were the 2 back ups. Doyle went to IR at the end of Sept and they really haven't replaced him. IDK about the former Arizona guy who they signed, but he was a RT there.

    But if you go down the list of available guys, it isn't that impressive.

    A washed up Eric Fisher?

    an equally washed up Nate Solder?

    idk.. maybe they activate Van Demer from the practice squad.

    The best thing they did last night was to scheme around the situation. He wasn't nearly the liability in the run game as in the pass game.

    I was really expecting Judon to have a big night against us, regardless of the injury. But he didn't.
    Yeah I would say most teams across the league are dealing with some OL injuries and all have OL depth issues. It's hard enough finding good starters let alone adequate backups. At this point in the season you're not going to find decent OL talent sitting around waiting for teams to call.

  5. #24
    Registered User notacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    32,677
    Thanks
    24,694
    Thanked 11,697 Times in 7,757 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    88

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quenssenberry gutted it out and was grinding out there....never giving up....giving his all.

    Just like the Bills have gutted it out and grinded their way to THREE wins over just TWELVE DAYS.....all on the road.

    This is the way championship level teams react to hardship and challenges during a long
    season.

  6. Post thanked by:

    Mace (12-02-2022)

  7. #25
    Registered User Canadian'eh!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fredericton, NB
    Posts
    12,863
    Thanks
    554
    Thanked 4,532 Times in 2,695 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    53

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Hats off to him for playing through pain. But let’s be honest. He ducked something awful. From the first snap he was just a turnstile. Dawkins doesn’t impress me, but he’s a lot better than the other options it seems. If Queesenberry is the only backup plan they have, it’s probably worth investing is a backup LT at some point.

  8. #26
    Haha...yeah you think so ? Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    20,301
    Thanks
    25,330
    Thanked 16,494 Times in 9,189 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    He gave it his best, damaged, and we had a conference/division win against the Pats. It wasn't great, but we made it. I have no gripes and give him a cheer. It might prove critical that he even held up this game. I'm good with it.

  9. Post thanked by:

    kgun12 (12-02-2022),Night Train (12-03-2022),YardRat (12-02-2022)

  10. #27
    honey pie Typ0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    32,583
    Thanks
    714
    Thanked 1,793 Times in 1,206 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    100

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quote Originally Posted by Forward_Lateral View Post
    If he knew how hurt he was, he should've told the coaches he can't play.

    - - - Updated - - -
    No, it doesn't work that way. These guys aren't worried about HR or the lawyers my friend -- they are trying to win as best they can. And along with everything they have to achieve in that plight they achieve a very high degree of intimacy as a group and a willingness to sacrifice that runs deep. Quessenbury was in that position because he was what we had that could best take a shot at getting the job done. There were a lot of problems in that game but I thought it was one of the best games I have seen the team play. They had to fight together to overcome those things and Allen played smart and decisive enough to make some big plays and get a lead. This team that is decimated and sickly.

  11. #28
    Registered User Mad Bomber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hell (Jest/Giants land)
    Posts
    12,917
    Thanks
    4,556
    Thanked 999 Times in 481 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    122

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quote Originally Posted by Kenny View Post
    I suppose, but why did the coaches even put him out there?

    He wasnt effective, and was a turnstile all game. Could have put in anyone else to have NE DEs run around, run through, etc... and it wouldnt have changed anything
    Because the alternative was Bobby Hart.

  12. Post thanked by:

    kgun12 (12-03-2022),Mace (12-03-2022),Night Train (12-03-2022),senseofdoom (12-05-2022),Woodman (12-04-2022)

  13. #29
    Do you read what you write? Oaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Posts
    6,139
    Thanks
    1,224
    Thanked 905 Times in 550 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Beane deserves a time out for the OL cast he's put together.

    It was a MVP night for Josh Allen to move the offense the way he did with the time he was given, and without an INT.

  14. #30
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    64,422
    Thanks
    5,609
    Thanked 7,576 Times in 6,134 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    180

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quote Originally Posted by Mad Bomber View Post
    Because the alternative was Bobby Hart.
    Nuff said!
    28**60**128**133**144**160**163**200**204**248


  15. Post thanked by:

    Mad Bomber (12-03-2022)

  16. #31
    Registered User Kenny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,728
    Thanks
    679
    Thanked 1,047 Times in 661 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: Quenssenberry deserves s shout out

    Quote Originally Posted by Mad Bomber View Post
    Because the alternative was Bobby Hart.
    And he was worse than Quenssenberry that game? Nope. Both were easily beaten to the outside, fooled by inside moves, or just bulled right over.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •