If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
That is total baloney. Especially concerning Detroit. That is a good team. They have won four of their last five games (only loss to Buffalo). Detroit (before this week) had the most difficult SOS of .611. They were coming off a big win at the NYG. They play hard and barely lost to Minnesota and Seattle.
The other wins vs Green Bay, and Cleveland were NOT “barely” beating them.
The Bills did NOT play “poorly” against the Lions and Browns. What ****ing games are you watching????....or are you watching Bills games with your Mega-Naga-fan, Negative Nancy loser glasses?!?!?
As usual, your judgment is for **** and your observations are incredibly obtuse.
We needed a last second FG against the Lions, who are NOT good. The Browns are bad and we were unable to put the game out of reach on multiple attempts. They ended up within 1 score. And again, this is the Browns.
We needed a last second FG against the Lions, who are NOT good. The Browns are bad and we were unable to put the game out of reach on multiple attempts. They ended up within 1 score. And again, this is the Browns.
Do you watch games, or do you just look at a team's record and assume?
We needed a last second FG against the Lions, who are NOT good. The Browns are bad and we were unable to put the game out of reach on multiple attempts. They ended up within 1 score. And again, this is the Browns.
They're 5-7. Their offense is good but their D is dead last in the NFL in YPG and 2nd to last in PPG. That's objectively not a good team no matter what you say.
you're one of the ones refusing to acknowledge how poorly this team has played since the bye, but I'm the one being obtuse? Please.
I never said they didn't play poorly in a few games. They had been decimated by injury. They are finally getting healthier, especially in the secondary. Having Rhodes and White out there is a huge difference vs having Dane Jackson and 2 rookies. The O-line is finally getting healthy (besides Dawkins, but hopefully he's ready by Sunday).
You refuse to acknowledge that A.) Josh was playing with an arm that was probably 70% healthy, at best. B.) They were put in a precarious situation for 3 straight games, but still managed to win all 3, C.) they are 9-3.
The last time I checked, every win counts, whether it's by 1 point, or by 100 points. There are no style points. There is no "But they didn't play their best". They are 4-2 since the bye. Should they be 6-0? Absolutely they should've won the Jets and at least tied the Vikings. It still doesn't take away the 9 wins that they do have.
The team is 9-3, despite all of the above. Injuries, illnesses, uncontrollable circumstances (mother nature), the ridiculous NFL schedule makers, etc. Will they win a superbowl? Who knows, but to say they have no shot at even winning a playoff game is absolutely flat out stupid.
Do you watch games, or do you just look at a team's record and assume?
I already called him out for this in that other thread regarding the Chiefs. He certainly hasn't been watching them, and just blindly sings their praises.
He only has eyes for the Bills playing poorly. It is obvious he looks at the box score for the majority of these arguments about other teams.
They're 5-7. Their offense is good but their D is dead last in the NFL in YPG and 2nd to last in PPG. That's objectively not a good team no matter what you say.
BULLCRAP!!!!
You diss the Bills because they have “played poorly” (which is totally FALSE) after the bye, and literally ignore the elite way they were playing to start the year......which you predicted would be a 2-5 start.
In your usual double standard blinders (but only blinders when it comes to the Bills, which you are dedicated to **** on them at every chance) you FAIL to recognize that the Lions have won four of their last five games, and have been playing extremely well in that stretch.....and have played very well in many, if not most o their losses to very tough teams
They are 5-7 because they have and the most difficult schedule in the NFL. .611 SOS up to week #12.
Their loses have come against almost all good to elite teams...
Philly - by only THREE points.
Minnesota - by only FOUR points.
Seattle - by only THREE points.
New England (their worst loss of the season)
Dallas
Miami - by only FOUR points.
Buffalo - by only THREE points.
Once again, you illustrate your total lack of objectivity all in order to **** on the Buffalo Bills.
Comment