Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in ambulan

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in ambulan

    New rule

    If a player is in this situation, the team should be given 10-15 minutes to process the information then move forward. Give the team a chance to process information, allow the team more time to re group, and it gives the league more time in these situations. And this time should be implemented immediately after the player has left the field

    ************PLEASE READ THIS CLARIFICATION!!!!!!!!***********

    Quote Originally Posted by Cntrygal View Post
    It was probably your wording. You specified "THIS" situation.

    In this particular situation, both teams watched a man die and being resuscitated before being taken away. The idea you proposed - sounded like you were saying that after 10-15 minutes, they should have resumed the game.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cali512 View Post
    I realize that now. When i said this situation, i meant in general when players are carried off in an ambulance or stretcher, give the players more time to re group and if there is a situation like hamlins, it gives the nfl and coaches/players some time to make a decision without the pressure
    Last edited by Cntrygal; 01-05-2023 at 07:09 PM.
    Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions

  2. #2
    Asst to Dean Vernon Wormer POTLAND PSILBYLO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon Cocoa Mate: Mandy Pepperidge
    Posts
    13,913
    Thanks
    4,316
    Thanked 4,873 Times in 3,393 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Who are you, Bill Maher?
    3

  3. #3
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,098
    Thanks
    30,688
    Thanked 30,656 Times in 17,508 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    What if they are taken off the field on a cart? That doesn't count?
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  4. #4
    Registered User sahlensguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13,465
    Thanks
    4,901
    Thanked 5,428 Times in 3,889 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    What if they deserved it?

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Quote Originally Posted by sahlensguy View Post
    What if they deserved it?
    Please explain

  6. #6
    Registered User sahlensguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13,465
    Thanks
    4,901
    Thanked 5,428 Times in 3,889 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Quote Originally Posted by Cali512 View Post
    Please explain
    No. Figure it out and rewrite your rule without loopholes.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Quote Originally Posted by sahlensguy View Post
    No. Figure it out and rewrite your rule without loopholes.

    What loophole? They already get 5 minutes in these circumstances, im saying make it 10-15


    ARE WE REALLY GOING TO ARGUE THIS?

    How the **** is this complicated?

  8. #8
    Registered User sahlensguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13,465
    Thanks
    4,901
    Thanked 5,428 Times in 3,889 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Quote Originally Posted by Cali512 View Post
    What loophole? They already get 5 minutes in these circumstances, im saying make it 10-15


    ARE WE REALLY GOING TO ARGUE THIS?

    How the **** is this complicated?
    Yawn.

  9. #9
    Registered User Novacane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Dade City, FL
    Posts
    42,343
    Thanks
    13,272
    Thanked 12,490 Times in 7,330 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    129

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Let's not overreact over a once in a lifetime freak accident.

  10. Post thanked by:

    kgun12 (01-05-2023)

  11. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Its not over reacting. Im saying give the players more time to process the situation. What harm does this cause? Literally the 2 issues people are talking about is that they apparently were given 5 minutes and the fact that they force teams to just go back to playing football

  12. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Its insane to me that giving players ten ****ing minutes to process a serious injury is a actual complicated issue for yall, **** man, this should be common sense

  13. #12
    Asst to Dean Vernon Wormer POTLAND PSILBYLO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon Cocoa Mate: Mandy Pepperidge
    Posts
    13,913
    Thanks
    4,316
    Thanked 4,873 Times in 3,393 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    "Your friend is dead. Here's 10:00, begin. ... Times up - back to work"

  14. #13
    Registered User sahlensguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13,465
    Thanks
    4,901
    Thanked 5,428 Times in 3,889 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Quote Originally Posted by SMOKE IT View Post
    "Your friend is dead. Here's 10:00, begin. ... Times up - back to work"
    When does the 10:00 clock begin?

    When the play is whistled dead, or when the player is dead?

  15. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Wait wait, i think yall mis took what i was saying

    Im saying that teams should be given 10 mins when a player is taken on a stretcher to give them time to re group and process it

    Im not saying in this situation they should be only given 10 minutes. Im saying give them time during serious injuries involving the neck or spine

    I think yall mis took what i was saying

  16. #15
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,098
    Thanks
    30,688
    Thanked 30,656 Times in 17,508 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    What is the old rule?

  17. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    I actually dont get how yall misread that this bad. Its pretty obvious the way i wrote it what i meant

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    What is the old rule?
    Player taken away, commercial break, back to football

  18. #17
    Registered User sahlensguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13,465
    Thanks
    4,901
    Thanked 5,428 Times in 3,889 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Ya'll?

  19. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Quote Originally Posted by sahlensguy View Post
    Ya'll?
    Go away

  20. #19
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,098
    Thanks
    30,688
    Thanked 30,656 Times in 17,508 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Quote Originally Posted by Cali512 View Post
    I actually dont get how yall misread that this bad. Its pretty obvious the way i wrote it what i meant

    - - - Updated - - -



    Player taken away, commercial break, back to football
    That's a real rule? In the rule book?

  21. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: New rule they should implement if players are in a stretcher or taken away in amb

    Its really bothering me that this isnt an obvious idea. To force players to go out and play a couple minutes after their player was nearly paralyzed isnt right to me. Im just saying we should give them some extra minutes to process it. How are yall not in agreement, its really bothering me

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •