Kind of wish we kept him. Are we going to be ok at goalie with what UPL?
Ulmark
Collapse
X
-
Re: Ulmark
Originally posted by jamze132 View PostKind of wish we kept him. Are we going to be ok at goalie with what UPL?
The Sabres have a lot of good, young offensive players, and aren't far from being true contenders in terms of offense. In terms of D and goaltending, they have work to do.
-
👍 1
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Ullmark was happy in Buffalo, but Buffalo looked the other way, and by the time they looked at Ullmark, he decided to test free agency. And the Sabres have neglected the position ever sense.
Dont get me wrong. I'm thrilled with UPLs development this season. And I'm thrilled with Anderson playing great at age 41. And I'm happy they tried Comrie. It was believed he could come into his own.
But...
Anderson can't play heavily IF they make the playoffs. UPL still has bad stats that are looking better, but nothing you should say "THATS OUR GUY!" with
And Comrie has been awful.
But they're locked in. And with a weak UFA goalie class this off-season, it's unlikely to be addressed for NEXT SEASON either.
And no, Levi is not an option for next year. Let him grow in the AHL
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Originally posted by sukie View PostSome say Levi at 21 will be NHL ready. Perhaps in a back up role at first.
The sabres would be best to find a true starter (if they expect to compete next year) and have UPL back him up.
Comment
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Originally posted by sukie View PostSo we don’t start goalies in the NHL until mid 20s earliest?
If he's ready, he's ready. But a season in Roch is going to help, not hurt.
Call him up for a game or so next year. But don't expect him to carry a backup load for a team that desires to make the postseason
Comment
-
-
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Originally posted by jamze132 View PostIt sucks because we have one of the best offenses in the league finally. We have to score at least 4 to win and sometimes that’s not enough.
I'm old school. Build from the net out. Get a goalie, build your defense. You can win being stingy. Offense is really the easiest weakness to go out and fix, right? So this feels backwards to me.
However! They seem to be doing it right. They have a potential franchise goalie in Levi. They have power who is developing, Sammy, who is great in his own end, and that Dahlin guy isnt bad either. You get a few more quality d-men, and you are REALLY cooking.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Who do you guys think was the last elite goalie to hit the open market? I can't think of anyone personally. Not sure I would call Bobrobsky elite. Can't really think of anyone else. Might need to trade for a goalie or draft one.
I also don't think it's fair to compare the Bruins to the Sabres IRT Ullmark. They are the best team in the league by 7 wins with a history of elite D and their no 1 C is an elite shut down man. Not exactly a fair comparison. I think early last year, they were regretting the deal. We will see if this is the new normal or a long heater.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Originally posted by mightysimi View PostWho do you guys think was the last elite goalie to hit the open market? I can't think of anyone personally. Not sure I would call Bobrobsky elite. Can't really think of anyone else. Might need to trade for a goalie or draft one.
I also don't think it's fair to compare the Bruins to the Sabres IRT Ullmark. They are the best team in the league by 7 wins with a history of elite D and their no 1 C is an elite shut down man. Not exactly a fair comparison. I think early last year, they were regretting the deal. We will see if this is the new normal or a long heater.
Comment
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Originally posted by OpIv37 View PostWell, I don't think we need to find an elite goalie on the open market, just someone younger than Anderson and more consistent than Comrie to share time with Ullmark for a year or two while Levi develops. If we can find that, then we're a playoff team. Not a real Cup contender, but a playoff team.
Actually just thought about something I read yesterday that the Canucks might trade Demko. He might be available but I doubt he will be cheap. They are looking to rebuild.
Comment
-
-
Re: Ulmark
Originally posted by mightysimi View PostThat's my point, even "serviceable" goalies don't come available. I bet you can have Binnington tomorrow but would you want him? Who else is even remotely available?
Actually just thought about something I read yesterday that the Canucks might trade Demko. He might be available but I doubt he will be cheap. They are looking to rebuild.
The only decent goalie that is cheduled to hit the market this off-season is Tristian Jarry and I don't think Pitt will let him walk. Freddy Andersen maybe?
I shouldnt say Adams neglected the position completely, I forgot he had a trade set up that would have given the Sabres the 7 pick AND Matt Murray for the 16th pick, but Murray said no.
Comment
-
Comment