McKenzie cut rejoice thread

[notacon]

First you said posts as in more than one! HOWEVER, I find it extremely funny that a poster that calls people names all the time, has been censored many times, and I think bad for negative and quite frankly classless posts has the balls to point fingers at other posters.
Remember; he without sin let them cast the first stone. You need to be ducking not chucking, lol!

Seriously?!?!?

Do I have round up posts from other threads that **** all over McKenzie???

Just stop with the lie that I “call people names all the time”. That is a false exaggeration.

[Woodman]

Rejoice thread ??????

We are moving on from McKenzie allow it to die there.

[kgun12]

Seriously?!?!?

Do I have round up posts from other threads that **** all over McKenzie???

Just stop with the lie that I “call people names all the time”. That is a false exaggeration.

Seriously, you haven’t been censored and been given a time out for your transgressions?

There used to be a rule here, attack the post not the poster and it came with a warning and the a timeout. Please bring it back, I know it would stop me doing it, not sure if all would stop, but it would clean up the board for the most part!

[Typ0]

Seriously, you haven’t been censored and been given a time out for your transgressions?

There used to be a rule here, attack the post not the poster and it came with a warning and the a timeout. Please bring it back, I know it would stop me doing it, not sure if all would stop, but it would clean up the board for the most part!

There are rules against baiting as well. I don't think they have done away with the rules though we have to understand they are very difficult to enforce.

[kgun12]

There are rules against baiting as well. I don't think they have done away with the rules though we have to understand they are very difficult to enforce.

I agree, and I took the bait with his post about classless posters. I should know better but yes I did here, I’ll admit it.

I guess my issue, a poster can dislike and should be able to express their opinion without being called out for it and you should be able to attack the post not the poster. Let’s get back to that. Put out the TOS rules again and start enforcing them. I think most everyone would be happy!

[notacon]

Seriously, you haven’t been censored and been given a time out for your transgressions?

There used to be a rule here, attack the post not the poster and it came with a warning and the a timeout. Please bring it back, I know it would stop me doing it, not sure if all would stop, but it would clean up the board for the most part!

What “transgressions”?!?!? Jesus, I have close to 30,000 posts.....surely you could come up with some examples of what you are accusing me of.

I adhere to “attack the post and not the poster” all the time in the Bills forum. But, I get attacked directly ALL THE TIME. I posted a list (not comprehensive by any means) of examples, but the post was deleted with the incorrect reason that it was a “TOS violation” when all I did was detail TOS violations directed at ME!!!!


Is that was you are referring to as me "been censored many times”??? Really??? How many times??? Where’s the beef????

And, sorry, calling a poster a “hater” (in respect to Edmunds hater) is not an attack on a poster....it is an accurate description of a mindset and the contents of posts. Undeniably so.

As I have explained before, “I express my strong opposition to what posters write. Very little “name calling” (expect in defending myself from others calling ME names).”

Jesus. Why don’t you just stop beating this dead horse that has little truthfulness??? As you go ahead and “ATTACK" me!!! May I suggest you get off your high horse and get real!!

[TacklingDummy]

There are rules against baiting as well. I don't think they have done away with the rules though we have to understand they are very difficult to enforce.

There are no rules.

Check it out. http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/sho...-in-this-forum

[kgun12]

What “transgressions”?!?!? Jesus, I have close to 30,000 posts.....surely you could come up with some examples of what you are accusing me of.

I adhere to “attack the post and not the poster” all the time in the Bills forum. But, I get attacked directly ALL THE TIME. I posted a list (not comprehensive by any means) of examples, but the post was deleted with the incorrect reason that it was a “TOS violation” when all I did was detail TOS violations directed at ME!!!!


Is that was you are referring to as me "been censored many times”??? Really??? How many times??? Where’s the beef????

And, sorry, calling a poster a “hater” (in respect to Edmunds hater) is not an attack on a poster....it is an accurate description of a mindset and the contents of posts. Undeniably so.

As I have explained before, “I express my strong opposition to what posters write. Very little “name calling” (expect in defending myself from others calling ME names).”

Jesus. Why don’t you just stop beating this dead horse that has little truthfulness??? As you go ahead and “ATTACK" me!!! May I suggest you get off your high horse and get real!!

It’s a simple yes or no!!!! Have you been censored and/or been given a timeout for sone of your posts. This isn’t Perry Mason, the answers requires a yes or no answer. I’m not going to go back and find them or you’re complaining about why you were censored or given a time out. BTW WWE already know the answer!

[Historian]

Guys...just let it go.

[Forward_Lateral]

Guys...just let it go.

This.

Drop it.

Like Isaiah would