Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

  1. #1
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    64,619
    Thanks
    5,628
    Thanked 7,609 Times in 6,163 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    181
    FSU WR K. Coleman #33
    Utah DB C. Bishop #60
    Duke DT D. Carter #95
    Kentucky RB R.Davis #128
    Georgia C S.VanPran-Granger #141
    Washington LB Edefuan Ulofoshio #160
    Troy DE J.Solomon #168
    UCF OT T.Grable #204
    Penn ST. CB D.Hardy #219
    England OT T.Clayton #221





  2. #2
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    64,619
    Thanks
    5,628
    Thanked 7,609 Times in 6,163 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    181

    Re: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

    Sounds reasonable

  3. #3
    Registered User Thurmal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    2,410
    Thanks
    3,720
    Thanked 2,558 Times in 1,030 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    24

    Re: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

    I feel better with him back there than Kyle Allen.
    "Miami played pretty damn good today and still got their ass kicked."

  4. Post thanked by:

    Historian (03-07-2024),Saratoga Slim (03-07-2024)

  5. #4
    Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat Mad Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Trapped behind enemy lines
    Posts
    6,567
    Thanks
    552
    Thanked 1,436 Times in 991 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37

    Re: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

    Quote Originally Posted by Thurmal View Post
    I feel better with him back there than Kyle Allen.
    That’s kind of like saying you’d rather kiss a pig than a rat but I guess?

  6. #5
    Registered User Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    9,228
    Thanks
    421
    Thanked 3,427 Times in 2,005 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

    Trubisky to me is easily the most talented backup QB we've had so far under Josh. I don't have any issue with him being back. That was a crappy situation he went to in Pitt. Bad OL and bad offensive coaching.

  7. #6
    Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat Mad Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Trapped behind enemy lines
    Posts
    6,567
    Thanks
    552
    Thanked 1,436 Times in 991 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37

    Re: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed View Post
    Trubisky to me is easily the most talented backup QB we've had so far under Josh. I don't have any issue with him being back. That was a crappy situation he went to in Pitt. Bad OL and bad offensive coaching.
    You’re technically correct but he’s being compared to Barkley, Allen, Nathan freaking Peterman hahahaha?!

    the king of the bum is still a bum.

    Also Mason 3rd stringer Rudolph won games and played significantly better than Trubs on that same terrible Steelers team.

  8. #7
    Registered User Forward_Lateral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The Great White North
    Posts
    29,825
    Thanks
    185
    Thanked 8,082 Times in 4,279 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    118

    Re: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

    When Daboll left and didn't take Trubisky with him, that's all I needed to know.

    That being said, he's a backup for a reason. If he has to play, the Bills are dicked anyways.

  9. #8
    Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat Mad Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Trapped behind enemy lines
    Posts
    6,567
    Thanks
    552
    Thanked 1,436 Times in 991 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37

    Re: Mitch Trubisky agreed to two-year, $5.25 million deal with Bills

    Quote Originally Posted by Forward_Lateral View Post
    When Daboll left and didn't take Trubisky with him, that's all I needed to know.

    That being said, he's a backup for a reason. If he has to play, the Bills are dicked anyways.
    It’s definitely nitpicking to criticize his signing as it was for not bringing back Araiza as the positional importance is much lower than the other positions. I guess the reason I do it is because I’d rather have an edge even if only slight in EVERY position since that’s sometimes the difference between winning and losing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •