Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OpIv37
    Acid Douching Asswipe
    • Sep 2002
    • 101230

    #76
    Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

    Originally posted by Forward_Lateral View Post
    Do you really think McDermott was going to bench Poyer or Hyde?
    If they’re not the best players, and he’s not benching them, that’s a huge problem.
    MiKiDo Facebook
    MiKiDo Website

    Comment

    • kscdogbillsfan1221
      Registered User
      • Nov 2007
      • 5651

      #77
      Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

      Originally posted by OpIv37 View Post
      If they’re not the best players, and he’s not benching them, that’s a huge problem.
      now THIS i completely agree with.
      I came.
      I saw.
      I conquered.

      Comment

      • Forward_Lateral
        Registered User
        • Mar 2004
        • 29895

        #78
        Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

        Originally posted by OpIv37 View Post
        If they’re not the best players, and he’s not benching them, that’s a huge problem.
        Again,

        Do you really think McDermott would've benched Hyde or Poyer?

        Comment

        • sukie
          Seriously?
          • Sep 2012
          • 21508

          #79
          Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

          Originally posted by OpIv37 View Post
          :facepalm:

          You claim Rapp is going to replace one of them. But Rapp was on the bench behind them. How do you not see the problem here?
          Because Poyer was a highly respected Safety and on a big contract. Regardless of his current skill set, he was the starter.
          I believe Terrell Bernard was a better LB than Edmunds but if Edmunds was still on the team we would know about Bernard expect for spot duty.

          i don’t think Rapp played Hyde’s safety roll BUT Hyde barely made the field, is still available and THAT speaks volumes.

          Comment

          • Forward_Lateral
            Registered User
            • Mar 2004
            • 29895

            #80
            Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

            Also, if your only argument is Rapp, then your point is idiotic anyways.

            They got rid of 2 aging safeties, re-signed a guy they obviously feel can do the job at one of the spots, and likely will draft one or two as well.

            You said "They replaced several positions with backups".

            No, they did not.

            D-line-- All starters returning, plus Von Miller back to 100% (hopefully)

            LBs--- All starters returning

            Corners--All starters returning

            O-line--All starters returning except LG

            RB-- All starters returning

            QB---All starters returning


            TE--All starters returning

            WR--No starters returning, unless you count Shakir, who I guess started some in the slot. Samuel replaces Davis, so really Diggs is gone, and he did f-all anyways when it mattered.


            What could you possibly be referring to, besides losing Diggs and 2 old ass safeties, one of which is probably going to retire anyways.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Originally posted by sukie View Post
            Because Poyer was a highly respected Safety and on a big contract. Regardless of his current skill set, he was the starter.
            I believe Terrell Bernard was a better LB than Edmunds but if Edmunds was still on the team we would know about Bernard expect for spot duty.

            i don’t think Rapp played Hyde’s safety roll BUT Hyde barely made the field, is still available and THAT speaks volumes.
            DING DING DING

            Comment

            • OpIv37
              Acid Douching Asswipe
              • Sep 2002
              • 101230

              #81
              Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

              Originally posted by Forward_Lateral View Post
              Again,

              Do you really think McDermott would've benched Hyde or Poyer?
              If they weren’t playing as well as the backup, he absolutely should have benched them. If he didn’t, it’s a problem.

              Again, this wreaks of just making excuses for why it’s acceptable to replace starters with their backups instead of bringing in more talent.
              MiKiDo Facebook
              MiKiDo Website

              Comment

              • OpIv37
                Acid Douching Asswipe
                • Sep 2002
                • 101230

                #82
                Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                Originally posted by sukie View Post
                Because Poyer was a highly respected Safety and on a big contract. Regardless of his current skill set, he was the starter.
                I believe Terrell Bernard was a better LB than Edmunds but if Edmunds was still on the team we would know about Bernard expect for spot duty.

                i don’t think Rapp played Hyde’s safety roll BUT Hyde barely made the field, is still available and THAT speaks volumes.
                I mean, if the coach is putting players on the field based on contracts and not based on who’s actually playing the best, we have much bigger problems than I thought.
                MiKiDo Facebook
                MiKiDo Website

                Comment

                • sukie
                  Seriously?
                  • Sep 2012
                  • 21508

                  #83
                  Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                  That happens all the time. Careers end new ones blossom. Players often play one too many seasons.

                  the drop off can be equal to or below the able bodied back up.

                  no way of knowing Bernard would play that well when Edmunds was in there. You can’t gauge a player on practice alone.

                  packers didn’t know how good Love was until Rodgers left. They didn’t know how good Rodgers was until Favre left.

                  Comment

                  • notacon
                    Registered User
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 32994

                    #84
                    Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                    Originally posted by OpIv37 View Post
                    All of them. They literally added nobody at the positions we lost.
                    Wrong, as usual.

                    Are you even awake when you write crap like this????

                    Comment

                    • OpIv37
                      Acid Douching Asswipe
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 101230

                      #85
                      Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                      Originally posted by notacon View Post
                      Wrong, as usual.

                      Are you even awake when you write crap like this????
                      Go ahead and write a 9 paragraph post to mind **** yourself into thinking we didn’t lose talent when we obviously did.
                      MiKiDo Facebook
                      MiKiDo Website

                      Comment

                      • OpIv37
                        Acid Douching Asswipe
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 101230

                        #86
                        Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                        Originally posted by sukie View Post
                        That happens all the time. Careers end new ones blossom. Players often play one too many seasons.

                        the drop off can be equal to or below the able bodied back up.

                        no way of knowing Bernard would play that well when Edmunds was in there. You can’t gauge a player on practice alone.

                        packers didn’t know how good Love was until Rodgers left. They didn’t know how good Rodgers was until Favre left.
                        QB’s are a completely different animal.

                        And if Poyer is on such obvious decline, and we have someone like Rapp on the bench behind him, then it’s on the coaches to make the switch.

                        And, the argument here is that Rapp has experience, but you just used two guys who had 0 experience as examples. Benching a S for another experienced S isn’t the same thing at all as benching a starting QB for one with no experience.

                        And, we can’t go into the season replacing guys with backups cuz “hey, you never really know til they play, right?” Again, that’s drought-era thinking.
                        MiKiDo Facebook
                        MiKiDo Website

                        Comment

                        • Mad Max
                          Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 6698

                          #87
                          Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                          Originally posted by OpIv37 View Post
                          QB’s are a completely different animal.

                          And if Poyer is on such obvious decline, and we have someone like Rapp on the bench behind him, then it’s on the coaches to make the switch.

                          And, the argument here is that Rapp has experience, but you just used two guys who had 0 experience as examples. Benching a S for another experienced S isn’t the same thing at all as benching a starting QB for one with no experience.

                          And, we can’t go into the season replacing guys with backups cuz “hey, you never really know til they play, right?” Again, that’s drought-era thinking.
                          Ok Op time for early predictions to determine the amount of your cynicism.

                          over or under 9 wins in your opinion for 2024?

                          Comment

                          • notacon
                            Registered User
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 32994

                            #88
                            Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                            Originally posted by kscdogbillsfan1221 View Post
                            Jesus dude, you’re incorrigible

                            Mike Edwards 2 time Super Bowl champ (replacing Hyde/poyer) isn’t a ‘kid’
                            Taylor rapp isn’t a ‘kid’ (replacing Hyde/poyer)
                            Curtis Samuel isn’t a ‘kid’ (replacing one of the wr)
                            Tre whites replacement (Douglas / benford) aren’t kids

                            I’ll give you McGovern as we don’t know what we are getting

                            and the two wr we need in the draft are kids

                            but to act like we are just winging it with replacements is just false
                            +1

                            Sure looks like Opi is taking the fantasy football mindset.

                            Of course in the real world it does not work that way. Players do NOT perform in a vacuum, like they do in fantasy football (full disclosure...I hate fantasy football...it's such bullcrap).

                            In a TEAM sport like NFL football, how the different pieces mesh together, and are suitable for an offensive and defensive scheme is much more critical than the silly......"No one has any idea how the kids will play. We lost Diggs, Davis, Poyer, White, Hyde and Morse. Expecting the kids to step up and play well enough to replace all of that…. Just insanity. Yes, they were all past their prime but it’s still a talent deficit. We have no one proven to be equal or better."

                            Of course, Opi does not even listen to himself. The most credible thing his whinefest expressed was "No one has any idea how the kids will play."

                            In Opi's fantasy football world, it's just assumed that the "kids" will not be as good as the departed, no matter if some of them were washed up has-beens. In Opi's fantasy world no young player ever gets better...no backup can replace a starter and do a better job. How lame!!

                            But, we DO know how the departed DID perform, especially in the most critical games.

                            Diggs - SUCKED in the playoffs, like he has in every single playoff loss the Bills have had his four years on the team. Once the offensive scheme changed after Brady took over, he was invisible. The Bills literally won MORE GAMES (7 including playoffs) than they did before Diggs was de-emphasized (5 up to the Denver debacle). Diggs had almost nothing to do with the Bills fantasit 6-1 finish (which Opi said would NEVER happen) . Diggs was TERRIBLE in the KC loss....an albatross.

                            Davis - His 55% catch % was the worst of any pass catcher on the team. MUCH less than Shakir's 86.6% and Kincaid's 80.2%. His route running was terrible. He could hardly ever get any separation. He was a dismally bad #2 WR last year. He did not play in either of the playoff games and he was not missed.

                            Poyer - damaged goods. He's done. No wonder the best FA offer he could get was barley above vet min.

                            White - damaged goods. Only played in 10 games the past two years. He was below average in at least half of those.

                            Hyde - more damaged goods. No one wants him.

                            Morse - good player on the downside of his career. So many concussions. McGovern will be just fine as his replacement. The Bills will not notice he's gone.

                            Opi's pearl clutching makes little sense in the real world. The NFL is a constant churn of players.

                            The offensive core is strong. Curtis is a great addition. Cook is coming into his own. Shakir is ready to become a star. Kincaid is poised to become a superstar. Josh Allen already is a superstar.

                            The Bills are well positioned to draft one or two good WR's. I suspect that one of this years WR draft choices will be starting on day one and do a very good job.

                            By mid-season we will probably all be saying that we are much better off without any of those departed players. In any event, it's best to wait and see what this team is going to be before declaring them dead and digging their grave.

                            How ****ing pathetic it is to do that....and Opi does it every ****ing year.

                            Comment

                            • sukie
                              Seriously?
                              • Sep 2012
                              • 21508

                              #89
                              Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                              Originally posted by OpIv37 View Post
                              QB’s are a completely different animal.

                              And if Poyer is on such obvious decline, and we have someone like Rapp on the bench behind him, then it’s on the coaches to make the switch.

                              And, the argument here is that Rapp has experience, but you just used two guys who had 0 experience as examples. Benching a S for another experienced S isn’t the same thing at all as benching a starting QB for one with no experience.

                              And, we can’t go into the season replacing guys with backups cuz “hey, you never really know til they play, right?” Again, that’s drought-era thinking.
                              Let me play devils advocate. Perhaps there was decline but not detrimental to put a guy in that you have only seen in practice.

                              perhaos the decline in practice should them to be equals… at least in practice.

                              players get old much like this conversation. I’d like to bench this Opiv since there is noticeable decline in his argument this time.

                              Comment

                              • OpIv37
                                Acid Douching Asswipe
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 101230

                                #90
                                Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

                                Originally posted by sukie View Post
                                Let me play devils advocate. Perhaps there was decline but not detrimental to put a guy in that you have only seen in practice.

                                perhaos the decline in practice should them to be equals… at least in practice.

                                players get old much like this conversation. I’d like to bench this Opiv since there is noticeable decline in his argument this time.
                                But it’s somehow ok to make the guy you’ve only seen in practice the starter for next season….gimme a ****ing break.
                                MiKiDo Facebook
                                MiKiDo Website

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X