Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

All of them. They literally added nobody at the positions we lost.

They added Curtis Samuel and lost Gabe. No loss

Corner they lost Tre, who really hadn't contributed in the last 2 seasons, and they got Douglas last year, who was a major upgrade.

The only position I will agree with you on safety, but Poyer and Hyde were gonzo regardless. There's STILL THE DRAFT.

They haven't replaced Diggs yet, so what's the point of complaining about it? They can't be any worse without him than they were the 2nd half of last season, when they basically won without him anyways.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Rapp was the backup. Douglas was brought in to complement White, not replace him, but I’ll give you that Benford spent most of the season playing for White anyway. Samuel not being a kid doesn’t mean he’s good enough to replace Diggs. You already said McGovern is a question mark. I’ll admit I don’t know much about Edwards but one can’t replace two.

Rapp started 33 games in a row for the Rams before signing with Buffalo. He was a backup last year, behind Poyer and Hyde, but he's not a career backup with no experience like you are making him out to be.

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Rapp started 33 games in a row for the Rams before signing with Buffalo. He was a backup last year, behind Poyer and Hyde, but he's not a career backup with no experience like you are making him out to be.

There’s a reason Rapp was the backup.

[sukie]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Yes Poyer and Hyde had a reputation of being good. Doesn’t mean they were anymore.

[Woodman]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Yes Poyer and Hyde had a reputation of being good. Doesn’t mean they were anymore.

Those days have passed.

[Woodman]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

You would be negative no matter who they signed.

This captures it.

[Woodman]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

“What Forrest?”
-OpI

Gregg.

So are we moving up?

[kgun12]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

I’ve come to the conclusion that Op CAN’T be this ignorant (lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about a particular thing.) He has to be just playing devils advocate! He thrives on being negative, I won’t be baited by him about this anymore.

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

I’ve come to the conclusion that Op CAN’T be this ignorant (lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about a particular thing.) He has to be just playing devils advocate! He thrives on being negative, I won’t be baited by him about this anymore.

Either that, or we lost talent and everyone is jumping through hoops to pretend that we didn’t cuz it’s easier to blame Op for being negative than face the reality that 2024 will be a setback.

[Woodman]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

I’ve come to the conclusion that Op CAN’T be this ignorant (lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about a particular thing.) He has to be just playing devils advocate! He thrives on being negative, I won’t be baited by him about this anymore.

Show me a positive upbeat post and i'll give you a nickel.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

There’s a reason Rapp was the backup.

Because they had Poyer and Hyde.

[Woodman]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Because they had Poyer and Hyde.

exactly it's not rocket science.

[kgun12]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Either that, or we lost talent and everyone is jumping through hoops to pretend that we didn’t cuz it’s easier to blame Op for being negative than face the reality that 2024 will be a setback.

Nope you’ve been doing this stick for too long for me not to think it’s an act. Why would anybody subject themselves to that much pain for that long.

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Because they had Poyer and Hyde.

:facepalm:

You claim Rapp is going to replace one of them. But Rapp was on the bench behind them. How do you not see the problem here?

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

:facepalm:

You claim Rapp is going to replace one of them. But Rapp was on the bench behind them. How do you not see the problem here?

Do you really think McDermott was going to bench Poyer or Hyde?

Also, did you not notice Rapp was on the field a lot last season, at safety when they moved Poyer down to more of a LB role?