Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

  1. #41
    Registered User sahlensguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13,356
    Thanks
    4,874
    Thanked 5,396 Times in 3,865 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy View Post
    Huh? He throws that kind of a ball all the time.
    Josh isn't the cerebral thrower with touch who throws the ball to a spot that where wr can change direction to and to where the DB can not. Josh is a power thrower. Aaron Rodgers he is not.

  2. #42
    Registered User kgun12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,288
    Thanks
    5,801
    Thanked 1,939 Times in 1,212 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy View Post
    I didn’t say the draft pick had to be the big splash, just that he needed one. I can absolutely see Beane thinking we’re close and going all in to try and get Nabers. I wouldn’t like it, but it fits his mentality.
    Unfortunately, I believe you are correct.
    Retired Air Traffic Controller
    USAF VETERAN
    DAV

  3. #43
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    64,901
    Thanks
    5,629
    Thanked 7,640 Times in 6,187 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    181

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by kgun12 View Post
    Unfortunately, I believe you are correct.
    Wow that would cost us a ton .... never put nothing past Beaner.
    FSU WR Coleman #33
    Utah DB Bishop #60
    Duke DT Carter #95
    Kentucky RB Davis #128
    Georgia C Granger #141
    Wash LB Ulofoshio #160
    Troy DE Solomon #168
    UCF OT Grable #204
    Penn ST. CB Hardy #219
    Eng. OT Clayton #221






  4. Post thanked by:

    kgun12 (04-20-2024)

  5. #44
    Registered User kgun12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,288
    Thanks
    5,801
    Thanked 1,939 Times in 1,212 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by Woodman View Post
    Wow that would cost us a ton .... never put nothing past Beaner.
    Way too much and we need to fill more that a few other positions, at least for quality depth!

  6. Post thanked by:

    Woodman (04-23-2024)

  7. #45
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    64,901
    Thanks
    5,629
    Thanked 7,640 Times in 6,187 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    181

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by kgun12 View Post
    Way too much and we need to fill more that a few other positions, at least for quality depth!
    100% agreed!

    Please make this your best draft Beanie.

  8. #46
    Registered User Saratoga Slim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,147
    Thanks
    421
    Thanked 1,191 Times in 625 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    29

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by Historian View Post
    Lets be honest.

    The last time the Bills had a legit #1 receiver, it was Eric Moulds.

    We are way overdue.

    KC won two SBS because of their quarterback's ability to vamp on the run, plus they have the best TE in football.

    Josh is a traditional pocket passer who needs a deep threat.
    Josh is a traditional pocket passer?????

  9. #47
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    21,430
    Thanks
    4,515
    Thanked 9,200 Times in 5,925 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by Saratoga Slim View Post
    Josh is a traditional pocket passer?????
    Yes he’s a mobile pocket passer. Duh, what have you been watching?

  10. #48
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,975
    Thanks
    30,629
    Thanked 30,612 Times in 17,479 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by cookie G View Post
    Well you could interpret it that way, but that's not what he meant. There are a few teams that have 2 legit No. 1's. Of courze there aren't too many of them.

    San Fran with Deebo and now Ayuk (at present);
    Tampa
    Miami
    Philly
    The Chargers did with Keenan Allen and Mike Williams

    Again, he said "ideally" or a word to that effect.
    I think it's exactly what he meant..."What this offense needs are guys that are smart, versatile, selfless, and can make the plays that their skillsets allow them to make."
    That doesn't scream traditional "#1 receiver" to anybody.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  11. Post thanked by:

    kgun12 (04-20-2024)

  12. #49
    Asst to Dean Vernon Wormer POTLAND PSILBYLO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon Cocoa Mate: Mandy Pepperidge
    Posts
    13,815
    Thanks
    4,300
    Thanked 4,844 Times in 3,370 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    I like the idea of not getting a vet #1 for high dollar and then have him double-teamed or otherwise schemed into nothing.

    Get a rotation of speedsters with hands and rotate them so that the D doesn't have a clue who's gunna do wut.

    That's just me, a jamo with a keyboard, but trading for Jefferspin or whomever just doesn't seem right. Get two good picks and maybe watch the wire or UDFAs. See if sukie can still run.
    3

  13. Post thanked by:

    kscdogbillsfan1221 (04-20-2024),YardRat (04-20-2024)

  14. #50
    Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat Mad Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Trapped behind enemy lines
    Posts
    6,661
    Thanks
    566
    Thanked 1,481 Times in 1,025 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by POTLAND PSILBYLO View Post
    I like the idea of not getting a vet #1 for high dollar and then have him double-teamed or otherwise schemed into nothing.

    Get a rotation of speedsters with hands and rotate them so that the D doesn't have a clue who's gunna do wut.

    That's just me, a jamo with a keyboard, but trading for Jefferspin or whomever just doesn't seem right. Get two good picks and maybe watch the wire or UDFAs. See if sukie can still run.
    Sukie can definitely run. Back and forth from the buffet table.

  15. Post thanked by:

    POTLAND PSILBYLO (04-20-2024)

  16. #51
    2020-2023 AFC East Champions! Historian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Upstairs
    Posts
    61,449
    Thanks
    32,900
    Thanked 28,389 Times in 15,511 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    206

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    putting somebody who barely saw the field in offensive sets like Mike Mosley with Woods, Reed, Piccone, etc is an insult to the other guys.
    I disagree.

    Mosley had good speed, soft hands, and made some spectacular catches for us whenever called upon.

    Unfortunately he couldn't stay healthy. (knees I believe)

    I always thought Byron Franklin was pretty special too.

  17. #52
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,975
    Thanks
    30,629
    Thanked 30,612 Times in 17,479 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by Historian View Post
    I disagree.

    Mosley had good speed, soft hands, and made some spectacular catches for us whenever called upon.

    Unfortunately he couldn't stay healthy. (knees I believe)

    I always thought Byron Franklin was pretty special too.
    Production should be the benchmark, not potential or physical attributes.

    I met Mosley during training camp his rookie season...kind of. He was pretty hammered sitting propped up against a wall on a barstool. I straightened out one of his beers so he wasn't spilling it.

  18. Post thanked by:

    Historian (04-21-2024),sahlensguy (04-21-2024)

  19. #53
    Registered User notacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    32,750
    Thanks
    24,755
    Thanked 11,725 Times in 7,777 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    88

    Re: We don’t need a number one receiver…says Beanie Baby

    Quote Originally Posted by ghz in pittsburgh View Post
    Amen to historian. Diggs is not a #1 receivers. Beane himself used words carefully that Diggs filled the #1 wr role when he got to Buffalo, not that he is the true #1 receiver in Buffalo. An argument can made that Davis in the last 2 years is used more like a #1 receiver, out snapped Diggs , running more boundary routes. More of the “using your size” kind of targets. Both Samuel and Shakir are projected to be in Diggs role.

    +1

    Diggs (mostly) totally crappy performances in the Bills' playoffs deem him to not be a true #1 WR.

    His 100% awful, terrible ****ty performance in the Bills' playoff losses during his time here made him more like a poor #4 WR, barely hanging on to a roster spot.

    TGS REC Catch % Yards AVG/Y/C Long TD AVG/Y/G
    4 Playoff LOSSES 35 16 45.71% 140 8.75 34 0 35
    3 Playoff loses Vs Chiefs 25 12 48.00% 105 8.75 34 0 35

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •