Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34

Thread: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

  1. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    19,350
    Thanks
    2,657
    Thanked 5,120 Times in 3,592 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    64

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Beane is tight with Morgan. He probably was told by Morgan that they wanted Legette and not Coleman and Beane told him he wanted Coleman. The Cheats come calling saying they want one of the two, Beane tells Morgan they want one of the 2 so Morgan moves up one to ensure they get Legette. The Bills win because they get their WR and a higher pick and the Cheats don't get either WR.

  2. #22
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    65,667
    Thanks
    5,652
    Thanked 7,691 Times in 6,227 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    183

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by sahlensguy View Post
    You're assuming Carolina knew we only wanted Coleman.

    Carolina guaranteed their guy by trading with us and that was the only way to do it.


    1) Ari 2)@ Mia 3) Jac 4)@ Bal 5)@ Hou 6)@ Jet 7) Ten 8)@ Sea 9) Mia 10) @ Colts 11) KC 12) Bye 13) SF 14)@ LAR 15)@ Det 16) Pats 17) Jets 18)@ Pats

  3. #23
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,082
    Thanks
    30,676
    Thanked 30,648 Times in 17,503 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by sahlensguy View Post
    You're assuming Carolina knew we only wanted Coleman.
    I'm not assuming, it's the implication in the video that I am disagreeing with. The trade makes more sense if they didn't have a 'gentlemen's agreement' and didn't know who we wanted to pick.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  4. #24
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,082
    Thanks
    30,676
    Thanked 30,648 Times in 17,503 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobylal View Post
    Beane is tight with Morgan. He probably was told by Morgan that they wanted Legette and not Coleman and Beane told him he wanted Coleman. The Cheats come calling saying they want one of the two, Beane tells Morgan they want one of the 2 so Morgan moves up one to ensure they get Legette. The Bills win because they get their WR and a higher pick and the Cheats don't get either WR.
    If Buffalo traded with New England the Bills would have been the team shut out from the two receivers. NE takes one at 32, Carolina at 33, and Buffalo is sitting there at the Patriot's former 34 with both guys gone.

  5. #25
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,082
    Thanks
    30,676
    Thanked 30,648 Times in 17,503 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    On a side note, it's going to be ironic if down the road Legette becomes the real stud of the class and the trade with Carolina ends up being worse than the one with KC.

  6. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    5,859
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 2,442 Times in 1,526 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    If Buffalo traded with New England the Bills would have been the team shut out from the two receivers. NE takes one at 32, Carolina at 33, and Buffalo is sitting there at the Patriot's former 34 with both guys gone.
    Buffalo is at the pole position whereas NE is at the vulnerable position - assuming (quite certain by all accounts) that they valued Legette and Coleman being the highest on their board, even borderline the remaining 1st rounders. I remember Beane explained last year in trade (up 2 slots) with the Jags to pick Kincaid, he had to give out info, like the pick is on offense or defense, even further down to O-line or other position etc. without actually giving out the name. Bottomline is the pole position team has to be comfortable that their prize is NOT threatened unless, of course, overwhelmed with the offer in which I don't believe is the case. We can probably assume that Beane felt threatened from NE's offer that they will pick one of Legette and Coleman. With Carolina in between, he had to make sure Caroline was not going to take Coleman. Like Gooblal said above, he is tight with Morgan. Morgan might have already checked with Beane but he should have no idea the conversation between the Bills and the Pats. The "gentleman's agreement" I suppose is referring to Beane shared that info to Morgan that the Pats were willing to pay to move up for one of Legette/Coleman. If Morgan was keying on Legette, then he felt threatened that his guy could go to the Pats right in front of him. Thus he had to pay up to the Bills to get to the pole position.

    If the Bills want Legette, none of this happens.

    If the Bills were taking open bids from the Pats and the Panthers, no one gives a damn about what comes about. But if you gather as much info as possible from me, probably already decided you don't want to do business with me based on that info, but turned around to use that info to benefit from a 3rd party, then you are "playing me." So Beane can forget about doing future trades with the Pats for awhile.

  7. Post thanked by:

    acehole (05-03-2024),Mad Bomber (05-03-2024)

  8. #27
    Registered User Bill Cody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    11,860
    Thanks
    1,220
    Thanked 5,982 Times in 3,519 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    48

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    If we wanted Coleman, that wasn't happening.
    We wouldn't have told Carolina who we were drafting. No reason to.

  9. #28
    Registered User notacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    32,911
    Thanks
    24,861
    Thanked 11,780 Times in 7,822 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    88

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Cody View Post
    Everyone knew NE wanted a receiver. Carolina wanted to make sure NE didn't leap frog them and grab Leggette. Buffalo had to know Carolina was trying to jump NE. Apparently we either liked Coleman as well as or better than Leggette. Screwing NE was just a side benefit for us.
    As I wrote in another thread....it's rather obvious that once Brian Thomas went off the board, Keon Coleman was THE player they had their sites on and wanted.

    A knowledgeable and skillful GM like Beane has already had his team of scouts and analysts not only develop their own draft board, but draft boards of other teams as well. It's well known that teams conduct their own mock drafts to go through all the possibilities of what other teams will do.

    From my other post...

    Beane knew that KC was not going to pick Coleman and did not care if they made Worthy (or any other WR on the board at that point) their pick. Beane also knew that the Cowboys, Ravens and 49ers were not going after Coleman. Turns out that he was ready to use #32 for Coleman, but then another gift landed in his lap with Carolina moving up. They obviously had their guy, Legette, in their sites and did not want any other team trading with the Bills to get him.

  10. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    19,350
    Thanks
    2,657
    Thanked 5,120 Times in 3,592 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    64

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    If Buffalo traded with New England the Bills would have been the team shut out from the two receivers. NE takes one at 32, Carolina at 33, and Buffalo is sitting there at the Patriot's former 34 with both guys gone.
    Yup. That's why they didn't trade down with the Cheats and instead used their offer/interest to get Morgan to trade up. Maybe Beane didn't tell Morgan he wanted Coleman and/or told him the Cheats wanted Legette only, which would have been smart. IDK, but he got his WR and a higher pick in the 5th round.

  11. Post thanked by:

    Mad Max (05-03-2024)

  12. #30
    Registered User acehole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    His moms house
    Posts
    4,876
    Thanks
    245
    Thanked 86 Times in 58 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    52

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    On a side note, it's going to be ironic if down the road Legette becomes the real stud of the class and the trade with Carolina ends up being worse than the one with KC.
    I actually think Leggete may have a better start.

    Once K Colmen and Josh Mesh its over.

    I do think that will take time.
    Hated by the stupid..
    Loved by their moms.


  13. Post thanked by:

    sahlensguy (05-03-2024),YardRat (05-08-2024)

  14. #31
    Registered User acehole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    His moms house
    Posts
    4,876
    Thanks
    245
    Thanked 86 Times in 58 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    52

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Reaching for Polk would indicate there is some truth to this/

  15. #32
    Registered User Bill Cody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    11,860
    Thanks
    1,220
    Thanked 5,982 Times in 3,519 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    48

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    On a side note, it's going to be ironic if down the road Legette becomes the real stud of the class and the trade with Carolina ends up being worse than the one with KC.
    It is a possibility. The only real knock on Legette is he only performed at a high level for 1 year. But he could just be a late bloomer.

  16. #33
    Registered User Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    9,240
    Thanks
    421
    Thanked 3,431 Times in 2,008 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    I think Dan Morgan knows Beane well enough to know that if he was willing to trade back from 28 to 32 then he didn't have any 1st round grades left, and would more than likely be willing to trade out of 32 again. So in order to not get jumped and secure Legette, Morgan made an easy offer to Beane that allowed both of them to still be in control of who they want. I'm sure Beane told Morgan he needed to know first who his guy was and in that scenario Carolina has nothing to lose by sharing the player.

    It's similar to last year when Beane traded up with Jax for Kincaid. The Jags GM wanted whatever O-lineman they ended up with so the Jags GM told Beane "you need to tell me if you're going big or small." Beane said "Medium" and the Jags GM said "you're taking a TE aren't you?" and Beane said "yeah". So the Jags made the trade because they felt good about still getting their guy, but they weren't going to budge unless Beane shared that info.

  17. #34
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    65,667
    Thanks
    5,652
    Thanked 7,691 Times in 6,227 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    183

    Re: Some inside details of the 32nd pick trade

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Cody View Post
    It is a possibility. The only real knock on Legette is he only performed at a high level for 1 year. But he could just be a late bloomer.
    1 year wonder .... not worth the 1st round gamble for most GM's.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •