Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: NFL.com stats

  1. #1
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23

    NFL.com stats

    #1 passing defense in the league

    huh- is this possible?

    It seems like Denver, Minnesota, and Chicago threw on us-

    I thought we did great on rushing defense against both the Jets and Chicago, but we are ranked 24th on rushing defense, by the way Oakland defense is #1 against the rush.

  2. #2
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23
    Anybody out there?

    Can this be possible- I find it very difficult to believe that this is true statistically.
    check out nfl.com

    http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NF...G/2002/regular

  3. #3
    Football-Sport of the Gods Buffarama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Rochester
    Posts
    1,231
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    Sort by columns, yards for instance, # of TD passes, and you will see they are under .500 in the bottom half for the most part. I don't know what sorted the Bills to #1 in the link you provided.

  4. #4
    Registered User RedEyE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    24,661
    Thanks
    938
    Thanked 882 Times in 493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    111

  5. #5
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23
    Sort by passing defense

    hit overall defense- then sort by clicking to passing defense

  6. #6
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23
    Red eye you sorted by passing/yards/game not overall passing defense

  7. #7
    Registered User RedEyE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    24,661
    Thanks
    938
    Thanked 882 Times in 493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    111
    Yeah I see what your saying now....and I'm not believing it any more than you are
    http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NF...G/2002/regular

  8. #8
    Football-Sport of the Gods Buffarama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Rochester
    Posts
    1,231
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    With 9 TD's given up, no INT's, and the amount of yards, other than sacks which is high, I can't see what formula would put them at #1.

  9. #9
    Registered User RedEyE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    24,661
    Thanks
    938
    Thanked 882 Times in 493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    111
    This seems more sound >
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...on=2&year=2002

    Passing yards per game is the ultimate decider, although we also need to remember that the 3 out of the 4 Bills games played so far have had 5 quarters instead of 4.
    Last edited by RedEyE; 10-01-2002 at 10:27 PM.

  10. #10
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23
    Agreed- your link makes much more common sense

    I think nfl.coms formula must have a bug in it

  11. #11
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23
    Even on that site we are 15th overall defense for both rushing and passing- still not too shabby. Too bad we are playing an offensive jaugernut ( spelling? ) this weekend.

  12. #12
    The Zone Editor LouGrant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    498
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: NFL.com stats

    Originally posted by bledsoe2moulds
    #1 passing defense in the league

    huh- is this possible?

    It seems like Denver, Minnesota, and Chicago threw on us-

    I thought we did great on rushing defense against both the Jets and Chicago, but we are ranked 24th on rushing defense, by the way Oakland defense is #1 against the rush.
    dude-

    no where on your link does it indicate Buffalo is #1 in anything. Just because they are at the top of the list doesnt mean anything.

  13. #13
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23
    It is a link which rates from top to bottom overall passing defense.

    Do you believe it is just a random listing?

    I believe it may be a mistake but not that it is a random listing.

    just as it ranks from top to botton any other category wich you ask it to search

    check out the nfl.com for yourself- click to overall defense then scroll down to passing defense. All that being said I believe 15th would be much more realistic- unless you take out any recption that Watson has allowed-lol

  14. #14
    In a jar, on a shelf, next to the unopened Miracle Whip.
    Administrator Emeritus
    Dozerdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Urbana, Maryland, United States
    Posts
    42,586
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked 233 Times in 92 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    137
    It's a random listing. Name just one category in which the Bills are at the top or bottom of the league in Defense....

    Well, Intrerceptions- we don't have any...

  15. #15
    Registered User losman2evans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23
    Ok- it is random- I give up

    If it were a formula though- one does not have to be at the top of any one category to be first.

    Maybe nfl.com was supoose to liost tem from top to bottom and it did not list them properly

    But why would they list them randomly rather than in error-

    lets see lets put the Bills first and lets put tis other team second and this other one third-

    Well I ave sufficiently beat this dead horse- I am convinced that 15 th is much more accurate and that was my initial query-

    thanks- but I will not believe it is random on purpose - but I will believe they are listed randomly due to some error in some formula that nfl.com was trying to use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •