If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
if the bears let the a-train go would you like him as a compliment to willis? he will be released due to his cap number and the emergence of t.jones.
your thoughts
if the bears let the a-train go would you like him as a compliment to willis? he will be released due to his cap number and the emergence of t.jones.
your thoughts
The Bears don't have to let him go, he is an unrestricted free agent.
That said, I think he wants to be a starter, not a backup. He will only sign as a backup if nobody offers him more playing time.
that and he'll probably want more money than we're willing to pay. I'm not comfortable with the backup situation though- if Willis goes down, Shaud Williams and Joe Burns are going to have to play RB by committee, and that won't take pressure off of JP.
I saw him play in college against Syracuse. He was an absolute stud, and he was really good early on for the Bears.
He's still young and probably feels he should be starting for someone - and he should be.
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
I am surprised that some of the top RB's aren't knocking on our door for a chance to backup Willis. I know that Willis made it through the season without any major problems with the knee, but until he plays another full season and the knee stays healthy, I would want to come here cause you never know when you may become the full time starter.
He has been backing up Priest Holmes the last few years, and though he will want more playing time he is unlikely to get a starting job. I would think KC isn't going to bring him back, unless they trade Larry Johnson.
Blaylock was very productive (career 156 car-723 yds-4.6 avg-10 TD rushing, 45 rec-474 yds-10.5 avg-2 TD receiving) for KC when he has played. He would be a nice change of pace from McGahee. Blaylock is built like Priest Holmes (short and stocky), and has good speed. He is a slashing-type runner and catches the ball well.
He could play the Kenneth Davis role to McGahee's Thurman Thomas. Blaylock is going to be a good player for someone.
I have a feeling that...this draft being ripe with RBs, that TD will prefer to draft an RB that won't complain about wanting to start and will be locked up for 3 yrs with us. He'll probably pick someone with potential but still needs work somewhere down and around the 6th round...maybe someone like Kay-Jay Harris
Last edited by mysticsoto; 02-28-2005, 01:58 PM.
Reason: Just adding info to it.
Comment