Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: For the record, and to set things straight...

  1. #1
    Drew and Sam stole all my hair WG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    The Nations Capital (N.VA)
    Posts
    9,450
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    For the record, and to set things straight...

    ...I don't nor ever did think that Drew sucks. Lately some have insinuated that I've stated or implied that. I've always maintained that Drew is an average QB who plays his best when he's supported by a solid D and a good rushing game.

    I think his stats after this week will support that notion. The reason why I've held this opinion is b/c he's received lots of accolades when he's really only put up two season's that were particularly noteworthy while he was in N.E. Those were the '96 and '97 seasons in which he tossed 27 TDs/ 15 INTs and 28/15. Other than that, he either threw way too many INTs or didn't have more than average (more than 20 TDs) numbers, particularly for a QB who threw for so many yards.

    Anyway, I'm only posting this to clear the air. There have been some charges lately that I think that Drew sucks when I don't. I think he's around say 12th or thereabouts in terms of overall QB value. This isn't negative nor is it meant to be.

  2. #2
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    71,579
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked 11,485 Times in 7,099 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    293

    Re: For the record, and to set things straight...

    Originally posted by Wys Guy
    ...I don't nor ever did think that Drew sucks. Lately some have insinuated that I've stated or implied that. I've always maintained that Drew is an average QB who plays his best when he's supported by a solid D and a good rushing game.

    I think his stats after this week will support that notion. The reason why I've held this opinion is b/c he's received lots of accolades when he's really only put up two season's that were particularly noteworthy while he was in N.E. Those were the '96 and '97 seasons in which he tossed 27 TDs/ 15 INTs and 28/15. Other than that, he either threw way too many INTs or didn't have more than average (more than 20 TDs) numbers, particularly for a QB who threw for so many yards.

    Anyway, I'm only posting this to clear the air. There have been some charges lately that I think that Drew sucks when I don't. I think he's around say 12th or thereabouts in terms of overall QB value. This isn't negative nor is it meant to be.
    You could have fooled me!

  3. #3
    Unreachable Douche
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    71,723
    Thanks
    9,826
    Thanked 6,943 Times in 4,386 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    204
    I've never heard you come right and say Drew sucks. Let me say it for you, Drew SUCKS. He's the healthy less moble version of Rob Johnson.

  4. #4
    You Don't Stand a Chance ! Alluro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    699
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    Drew Bledsoe should be shipped out of town as soon as possible. i'd be willing to take a 2nd round pick and chalk it up as a mistake if it came to that, but i'm hoping the boys would give buffalo their first rounder once Parcells takes over. Bill might want his QB back.

  5. #5
    Drew and Sam stole all my hair WG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    The Nations Capital (N.VA)
    Posts
    9,450
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    I'm not gonna disagree w/ any of that, or shipping him out of town. You know that I was highly, and one of the lone voices vehemently opposed to this trade for this very reason. Do I think it was a bad decision, absolutely.

    BUT, Drew is still an average or avg. + QB. He's not as bad as many in this league. I think that the notion that he's not a top 10 QB has borne itself out over the past several games. But again, if used properly, we can make the best of a bad situation.

    We simply can't afford to acquire another QB this offseason, at least not a name one. We're gonna have to make due for at least next year. It may cost us in the playoffs then, but we're simply gonna have to make due.

    It's a tough situation we're in which is what I feared. I still don't know how someone can start off so strong and then fade like this down the stretch. He started off like Marino and ended up worse than RJ. It's really bizarre. Even I'm a tad bit puzzled at how this has unfolded having expected some bad play in big games.

    We need to focus on our D this offseason. Let Price go, work Reed in, and get some D players to take this now average D to the next level, a top 5 D!!!

    Henry and a great D will win us the division next year.
    Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!

    Then let's go to Disneyworld!

    GO BILLS!!!


  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,757
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27
    I really hope they don't let Price go. Reed is going to be a great underneath guy and can get some good YAC yards, but he really is no big play threat and as it stands now, we don't have enough big-play players on the team. The reason we lost games was not because we made too many mistakes (mistakes are gonna be made, and we definitely did not make more than our share), its that we didn't make enough big plays to make up for our mistakes. Losing one of our biggest big-play players (probably #3 on the team for big plays - behind EM and DB) would really have to bring in some great help on D to make up for it.

  7. #7
    honey pie Typ0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    32,592
    Thanks
    714
    Thanked 1,794 Times in 1,207 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    100
    He faded down the stretch so bad because of lousy game plans too reliant on his throwing 90 yd td passes. It's like we didn't even care about the game at the line of scrimmage. You have to win the small battles first.

  8. #8
    Registered User The_Philster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Section 122, row 13, seat 6
    Posts
    52,180
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    157
    It'd be nice to keep Price but I don't see it happening. Moulds can stretch the field just fine and maybe a cheaper free agent can be brought in to compete with Charles Johnson and Andre Rone for the #3 spot....one with speed. There's no rule that says the #2 WR can't play in the slot underneath.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,757
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27
    Philster, if they bring in another big play receiver, I don't mind ... however, every time I hear someone talk about letting go of Price, no mention is made of bringing in another receiver to replace him. IMO, elevating JR to #2 and having CJ step up to #3 is a huge downgrade for our offense. I'd be amazed if JR puts up more 1200+ yards and 10 TDs next year so for our offense to be as good, CJ would have to be an upgrade over JR's 500 yards and I really don't think there's any chance of him returning to that quality of player ... so if we're letting go of PP, we'd really have to get some big playmakers on D to compensate.

  10. #10
    Drew and Sam stole all my hair WG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    The Nations Capital (N.VA)
    Posts
    9,450
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    Boston will be available, and he may go for what Price does. If he goes for more, then he'd be worth more. Before I'd spend a dime for Price, I'd take my chances on a huge contract with Boston or another.

    But we can't afford to look at expensive offensive players. CP and EB stated earlier that we'll be able to sign 2, maybe 3, name players. We have too many weaknesses/needs on D to take a WR. What is starting to smart is this loss of a first rounder.

    Besides, and this applies especially while Drew's here, we need to taper down the passing game, not add to it and increase it.

  11. #11
    Registered User The_Philster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Section 122, row 13, seat 6
    Posts
    52,180
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    157
    We simply don't have much beyond Moulds, Reed, and Price this year. We had a pair of young WRs the last few years with promise in McDaniel and Germany. They're both out of the NFL now, I believe. CJ used to be a solid WR and I expected a lot more from him than I've seen this year and Andre Rone has been inactive all year. Hopefully, Rone will get some significant playing time against the Bengals. Beyond that, we have Reggie Allen on the reserve list and God only knows if he'll ever get the chance to make the squad with the injuries he incurred in NFL Europe or whatever happened to him. Anyone remember?
    Anyway, what I'm saying is that a free agent is pretty much a necessity to pick up because we can't afford to spend our #2 pick on a WR.

  12. #12
    Dudly Do-Right
    Guest
    Boston would be a waste of money. Too many private issues and he's not the speed receiver we need.

    I think Peerless is a risk as well. Once he gets a huge new contract, I wonder if he'll play as hard. Even this year he took too many downs off or had mental breakdowns to command #1 pay, IMO.

  13. #13
    Registered User Tatonka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    My house
    Posts
    21,289
    Thanks
    403
    Thanked 236 Times in 103 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    70
    i think that we will see the bills draft another wr... there are alot of good ones in this years draft..

    as cool as it would be to see boston and moulds together .. it wont happen.. boston wouldnt sign somewhere to be a number 2
    "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

  14. #14
    Drew and Sam stole all my hair WG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    The Nations Capital (N.VA)
    Posts
    9,450
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    Heck, he can be our #1. So far, Moulds has never put up indisputable #1 numbers.


    Dudley Do Right,

    Totally agree with you. Just saying that if we do spend that kind of money, take Boston over Price. We can find some fine WRs to work in and Reed is gonna be special. He already is. I have no doubt that he could have posted the numbers that Price did and he wouldn't have had half the dropped balls.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,757
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27
    Originally posted by Dudly Do-Right
    Boston would be a waste of money. Too many private issues and he's not the speed receiver we need.

    I think Peerless is a risk as well. Once he gets a huge new contract, I wonder if he'll play as hard. Even this year he took too many downs off or had mental breakdowns to command #1 pay, IMO.
    I agree they both have risks associated ... but IMO the biggest risk is to go into next season with less playmakers when we already lack playmakers on the squad.

    IMO, DB, EM, and PP are the only players that consistently seem to make the big plays that can turn the game. TH is great at running the ball (as my moniker implys, I love the guy), but he doesn't seem to make that many game-turning plays. On defense, we don't have anyone that can make plays at all consistently (maybe LF if we get some DT's, but I still don't think he'd be at PP's level and NC may turn into that type of player, but not yet). So if we don't sign a big-name receiver and instead end up settling for 2 or 3 middle-of-the-road defensive players (i.e. missing out on Roosevelt Colvin, Takeo Spikes, et al and getting guys of Phil Hansen-type quality - a big possibility IMO), we'd end up with a team that has no big play capability outside of the QB and #1 WR. I don't see any rewards at all to the defensive side in this situation (we'd improve slightly, but really the biggest problem on D is no big plays) and some huge risks on the offensive side - asking EM, DB, and TH to put up similar #'s without PP.

  16. #16
    Dudly Do-Right
    Guest
    It won't be an easy decision for TD, that's for sure. Signing PP is a risk and almost guarantees that we can't pursue a quality LB or DT in FA.

    I still think we take a chance on Josh Reed and a journeyman WR or maybe a hidden draft gem and devote our energy to building up our Defense. Other than the one flukey win by the Rams a few years ago, no team has won a SB without a solid Defense.

  17. #17
    Unreachable Douche
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    71,723
    Thanks
    9,826
    Thanked 6,943 Times in 4,386 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    204
    Originally posted by HenryRules
    TH is great at running the ball (as my moniker implys, I love the guy), but he doesn't seem to make that many game-turning plays.
    He makes many game turning plays. Whats he got 8 fumbles now?

  18. #18
    Dudly Do-Right
    Guest
    Originally posted by TacklingDummy


    He makes many game turning plays. Whats he got 8 fumbles now?





  19. #19

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    2,757
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27
    I think what is most important is that TD makes his mind up quickly and immediately goes after the big playmakers ... if he waits to join the FA market in hopes of getting a bargain, we could be left with middle-of-the-road players and a team destined to finish 9-7/10-6 and be out of the playoffs in the first round.

    I'm not sure on the cap sit., but I think by cutting JR, we could sign PP, Roosevelt Colvin, and hopefully a DT and a corner. IMO, its more important to come out of this offseason with 2 playmakers (including PP if he's resigned) than to plug 3 holes on D with average players.

    I agree that a solid D is a necessity to win SB's, but so are playmakers, and without PP, we only have 2 of those.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: For the record, and to set things straight...

    Originally posted by Wys Guy
    ...I don't nor ever did think that Drew sucks. Lately some have insinuated that I've stated or implied that. I've always maintained that Drew is an average QB who plays his best when he's supported by a solid D and a good rushing game.

    I think his stats after this week will support that notion. The reason why I've held this opinion is b/c he's received lots of accolades when he's really only put up two season's that were particularly noteworthy while he was in N.E. Those were the '96 and '97 seasons in which he tossed 27 TDs/ 15 INTs and 28/15. Other than that, he either threw way too many INTs or didn't have more than average (more than 20 TDs) numbers, particularly for a QB who threw for so many yards.
    On the whole I would agree - he's an ok QB when you average out the great games and horrible games. One of the reasons the DB opinions seem to be so polarized is because there ISN'T any middle ground when you break down his games individually. He either throws for 300+ yards/3TD's/0int's, or 200 yards/0TD's/3int's. It's hard to win a SB with that kind of inconsistency. I think you're better off with a guy who puts up 250 yards/2TD's/1 int every game. He's really only played 3 of those "manage the game" type games this year - against the Lions, Broncos, and the 1st Dolphins game; and we're 2-1 in those games. I'd like to think this is something he can fix, but that's unlikely given that he's been around for 10 years now.

    It's extremely frustrating because I seem to remember patience being one of his strenghts in NE when he was taking the short stuff to Coates&Martin. 6 years later he looks like a rookie just looking for the big play, not checking down, and taking sacks at bad times.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •