Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Mike Mularkey

  1. #1
    Registered User Mahdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada, Ottawa
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 1,184 Times in 712 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Mike Mularkey

    Obviously lots of us on this board wanted MM fired. But I think he desereves one more year with a solid O-line and D-line to work with. If everyone can give McNally a pass on a crappy O-line because he had virtually nothing to work with, then why doesnt Mularkey get a pass for not having an O-line and D-line to work with? It's exactly the same logic. And no matter what, you never win in this league without a strong or at least above average O-line and D-line. I'm willing to give MM one more year to right the ship, provided we bring in some solid linemen, otherwise it will be the same old story no matter what coach was here.

  2. #2
    Registered User Turf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Rochester
    Posts
    8,374
    Thanks
    515
    Thanked 2,493 Times in 1,487 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    I think his play calling and trick plays are the most worrisome traits he has.
    Lou Saban: You can get it done, you can get it done. And what’s more, you’ve gotta get it done.

  3. #3
    Registered User dolphinssuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    880
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    20

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    MM had some bad playcalling problems quite often and benching JP and stunting his opportunity to gain valuable exp was just plain stupid. Hopefully now that TD has gone some of this will improve and he'll use better judgement overall.

  4. #4
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Quote Originally Posted by dolphinssuck
    MM had some bad playcalling problems quite often and benching JP and stunting his opportunity to gain valuable exp was just plain stupid. Hopefully now that TD has gone some of this will improve and he'll use better judgement overall.
    Only time will tell if he hires a top-notch OC that he doesn't have to revoke playcalling duties from - if we can get that far, and get McNally some talent I'm ok with Mularkey too for one more year - it's up to him to sink or swim - hopefully he swims, but if not, we're all used to being in this boat and unfortunately we'll be enduring it for at least one more year.
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

  5. #5
    Maybe? Mr. Cynical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    9,766
    Thanks
    1,182
    Thanked 486 Times in 283 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Mike Mularkey



    MM had two years to show leadership, playcalling ability and fire. He didn't show any of those.

    FIRE HIM NOW.

  6. #6
    Registered User Drive 4 Five's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,202
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Cynical


    MM had two years to show leadership, playcalling ability and fire. He didn't show any of those.

    FIRE HIM NOW.

    showed all of those things you just described (Mr. C.) in his 1st season. One good season - one bad one.

  7. #7
    Maybe? Mr. Cynical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    9,766
    Thanks
    1,182
    Thanked 486 Times in 283 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Quote Originally Posted by Drive 4 Five
    showed all of those things you just described (Mr. C.) in his 1st season. One good season - one bad one.
    I disagree....how can you lose leadership ability and fire in one offseason? He never had it IMO.

  8. #8
    Registered User audio/s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Centeral Pa.
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    20

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    As i recall one of mularkeys"trick Plays that worlked was last year when Drew fake qb snuck(plural of sneak?) and lateraled to WM for a 1st and more. (please correct me if im wrong)

  9. #9
    81 st zoner mybills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    right here
    Posts
    61,717
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 38 Times in 17 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    200

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahdi
    Obviously lots of us on this board wanted MM fired. But I think he desereves one more year with a solid O-line and D-line to work with. If everyone can give McNally a pass on a crappy O-line because he had virtually nothing to work with, then why doesnt Mularkey get a pass for not having an O-line and D-line to work with? It's exactly the same logic. And no matter what, you never win in this league without a strong or at least above average O-line and D-line. I'm willing to give MM one more year to right the ship, provided we bring in some solid linemen, otherwise it will be the same old story no matter what coach was here.
    I said the same thing and was laughed/yelled at. I'd give him one more year out of the three. It's tough for new players to gel, then you throw in a new GM, D coach, O coach...jeesh! They have something with MM, be it something small, but I can't see starting over with a new HC. I think MM can & will have more weapons to work with, especially if the new GM hires someone who knows how to pick in the draft.
    I didn't come here to fight, I hate fighting. Life is way too short to spend it on fighting! Go fight with yourself, one of you will eventually win!

  10. #10
    81 st zoner mybills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    right here
    Posts
    61,717
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 38 Times in 17 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    200

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    And hopefully Marv WILL look over his shoulder, or at least let him know how bad he ****ed up and not to use his bonehead ideas on the playing field ever again!

  11. #11
    2020-2023 AFC East Champions! Historian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Upstairs
    Posts
    61,630
    Thanks
    33,000
    Thanked 28,496 Times in 15,582 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    207

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    How do we know that Donahoe wasn't the problem all along, like a boa constrictor around his neck?

  12. #12
    Registered User jmb1099's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Rochester, New York, United States
    Posts
    3,354
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Power to Give Rep
    32

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Seeing as how we have little choice in the matter...
    Was it all TD? Seems like too easy a scapegoat, but I do think MM first year was better in many regards than the second. Still if we had a suprise press conference talking about Mike Sherman being hired on so MM could pursue other interests I'd be a happy man indeed.

  13. #13
    Lets GO BUFFALO!! SquishDaFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
    Posts
    17,034
    Thanks
    2,507
    Thanked 647 Times in 378 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    77

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    If TD would of just gave him an OLINE and not more WRs then I bet MMs play calling would of been different. He had to do trick plays with this crap line we have. Give him one more year.

  14. #14
    Registered User Turf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Rochester
    Posts
    8,374
    Thanks
    515
    Thanked 2,493 Times in 1,487 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    40

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Obviously Levy sees something in him, so I'm willing to go along with it one more time. What keeps resonating over and over in all of these choices and goes classfully unsaid is what an ass Donahoe must have been.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    13,690
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 58 Times in 30 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    61

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Now bring in Turner and tell MM "hands off the offense!"

  16. #16
    Registered User TedMock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,221
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 169 Times in 106 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    29

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Quote Originally Posted by Billsology
    How do we know that Donahoe wasn't the problem all along, like a boa constrictor around his neck?
    Bingo! The guy doesn't just go from "genius" offensive coordinator to complete moron overnight. I think there was panic and desperation involved with a lot of this. Marv should be the anti-TD and let Mularkey do his thing without too much interference. Let's see if Marv and Modrak do their part, and bring in an o-line too. Mularkey should now be able to relax and use his creativity wisely. If the guy just flat out sucks under good circumstances, then he's out anyway.

  17. #17
    Ground your Jets Vilma, no way you're shooting this guy down. ShadowHawk7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    You recall correct. We tried that in Seattle last year on 4th and 1, and it turned into a 30 yard TD run for McGahee. MM was thought of a genius for that. We tried again this year, it didn't work out, we got sacked, and MM was called a bumbling idiot.
    "It's not whether you win or lose; it's how you play the game."
    -Vince Lombardi

  18. #18
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Cynical


    MM had two years to show leadership, playcalling ability and fire. He didn't show any of those.

    FIRE HIM NOW.
    How much of that ineptitude was the result of him being TD's puppet though?

    You can't deny that there is some writing on the wall pointing to that.

  19. #19
    I'm right, Miyagi is wrong. HAMMER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    8,132
    Thanks
    902
    Thanked 999 Times in 523 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    You can only pound the ball into the line so many times for no gain before you HAVE to try something else. Villarial said it best, you are only a smashmouth team when the other team knows you are going to run the ball and you still get the yards. Our line could not get it done, Mularkey had to try something to move the ball. This all being said, I hated some of his calls. Perhaps the thing I understand the least is McGahee never being on the field on 3rd down.

  20. #20
    Maybe? Mr. Cynical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    9,766
    Thanks
    1,182
    Thanked 486 Times in 283 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Mike Mularkey

    Quote Originally Posted by ublinkwescore
    How much of that ineptitude was the result of him being TD's puppet though?

    You can't deny that there is some writing on the wall pointing to that.
    I don't doubt that TD meddled....but still...MM took over the playcalling from TC and it went from bad to worse. In addition, everytime I saw MM on the sidelines he looked like he needed a beer and a dog in his hands. Have you ever seen him get even "mildly" pissed off at a player or ref? Given the type of season we had he should have been in many a face but wasn't. And for those who say there are the "quiet coaches" like BB, forget it. I think we all know he is not a silent giant with genius-like schemes.

    No playcalling ability. No leadership. No fire. All signs point to another s**t season.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •