Kevin Everett - Update video
Collapse
X
-
Re: Kevin Everett - Update video
Everett is honestly a little bit of both kinds of WR. Not the most gifted receiver when it comes to receiving but can definitely get the job done. He is also a very solid blocker. Being a "U" fan, going from Shockey to Winslow to him was definitely a step down cause he isn't as falshy as the other two but when you watch his career as a whole he is defintely pretty darn good. He is a better blocker then Winslow but not quite as good a receiver. Not the sharpest route runner either. He will be a nice compliment to the team this season as I know he will beat out Royal for the starting position.
Ryan Withey
Owner/President/GM/Director of Player Personnel
Kansas City Super Deuces
Comment
-
-
Re: Kevin Everett - Update video
Originally posted by patmoran2006Considering we gave Royal $10 million I would hope HE'S the starter.. OR did we pay $10 million for another backup, just like we did with Josh Reed?
man.. this kind of ****ing comment is getting so old and played out.. i must have read it 150 times since free agency.
it can only be explained so many ****ing times before it sinks the **** in for some people.
4 years for 10 million isnt **** for money.. and all of the 4 year 10 million dollar deals are back loaded.. if they dont play well, they will be gone and it has cost this team chump change.. so get the **** over it and stop ****ing repeating your seft for **** sakes.. jesus.. so ****ing annoying."All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
Comment
-
-
Re: Kevin Everett - Update video
I really like Pat, and everybody have the right to have their own opinnion, but some times, it gets out of his control.
Thanks for the info Mr. T.The Mexican & too!!
- Adriano & Emiliano, the next Villa & Zapata. Viva Mexico, cabrones!!! -
Comment
-
-
Re: Kevin Everett - Update video
Originally posted by Tatonkaman.. this kind of ****ing comment is getting so old and played out.. i must have read it 150 times since free agency.
it can only be explained so many ****ing times before it sinks the **** in for some people.
4 years for 10 million isnt **** for money.. and all of the 4 year 10 million dollar deals are back loaded.. if they dont play well, they will be gone and it has cost this team chump change.. so get the **** over it and stop ****ing repeating your seft for **** sakes.. jesus.. so ****ing annoying.
Royal's deal is for FIVE years and not four.. And you have to be totally mental to call his contract a "backloaded" contract.
Bills | Contract update: Royal
signed a five-year contract that includes base salaries of $585,000 (2006), $1.3 million (2007), $1.675 million (2008), $1.525 million (2009) and $1.44 million (2010).
Did I mention he got a $2.5 million signing bonus??? For the mathematically challenged, that means his cap figure is a half million for each year of his deal on his SIGNING bonus alone.. And if you think that's a backloaded contract maybe you should re-examine your knowledge on football. A "backloaded" contract is when almost ALL of the money is in the bottom two years of a contract, something along the lines Ryan Denney signed.
So with that contract, YES he BETTER be our starting TE or he was a TOTAL waste of a signing.. $1 million plus cap hit in his FIRST year of the deal is "chump change"?
And the SAME goes for Josh Reed.
Bills | Contract update: J. Reed
signed a four-year contract that includes base salaries of $600,000 (2006), $1.65 million (2007), $1.825 million (2008) and $2.025 million (2009).
He also got a $2 million signing bonus ($500k per year on the cap). His contract is FAR from "backloaded" as well.
So either he starts or is the number three receiver or AGAIN this was a STUPID signing. Is it still CHUMP change to just cut him if he doesnt produce this year, as he's barely done in FOUR years previously. That's $1.5 million cap hit ALONE just to cut him.
that shouldnt be "chump change" to a team that's been playoff-less for six years running.
So either Royal DOES start and Reed DOES at least be the #3 OR they were TWO useless and expensive signings and as you can see they are NOT backloaded contracts.
Maybe next time before one of your childish cuss-tantrums you can actually have an ideal of what you're TALKING about.
Comment
-
Comment