Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

[ghz in pittsburgh]

He's right. It's hard to read on that coverage because it appeared to be zone initially. Is Duvernay Poyer's guy? he escaped to the right corner wide open while Lamar is being chased by Von and Greg. Lamar said in his presser that "big man" in front him, partially blocking his view until late.

But to Poyer's credit, he recovered just in time. And the result is perfect - an INT to get the ball to Josh's hand at 20 yard line.

I would have kicked the FG, but Lamar Jackson had Mike Davis wide open on the left side and Devin Duvernay broke open in the back of the right side. https://t.co/NJ3PkPrwE1

— Jeff Zrebiec (@jeffzrebiec) October 2, 2022

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

The Refs gave Lamar a chance to be the hero by not calling holding on both of their tackles.

[jamze132]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

The Refs gave Lamar a chance to be the hero by not calling holding on both of their tackles.

Yeah they got away with a lot of holding, especially in the first half.

[sukie]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

Lawson was almost bent in half backwards

[DraftBoy]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

Yeah that would have been really weak holding calls if the refs threw the flags. I'm glad they didn't.

Glad Poyer made the play, but hope Frazier addresses the issue in film breakdown.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

Lawson was almost bent in half backwards

At least it was horrible for both teams this week.

[kscdogbillsfan1221]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

This is a good example of how a good pass rush can really help out the secondary

if the pass rush doesn’t get in Lamar’s face, that’s an easy touchdown

[YardRat]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

I didn't even notice Davis wide open on the left until it was pointed out. Chances are high that would have been a TD if Allen were the QB.

[Goobylal]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

Yeah the RT should absolutely have been called for holding. Glad they overcame it.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

Yeah that would have been really weak holding calls if the refs threw the flags. I'm glad they didn't.

Glad Poyer made the play, but hope Frazier addresses the issue in film breakdown.

It's actually good they didn't call it. If they call it, the Ravens kick a FG.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

It's actually good they didn't call it. If they call it, the Ravens kick a FG.

How? the Bills would have declined the penalty

[ghz in pittsburgh]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

I didn't even notice Davis wide open on the left until it was pointed out. Chances are high that would have been a TD if Allen were the QB.

Every defense playing against Jackson knows where his first read is. And his strength is throwing to the middle.

Allen is much better at this stage going through progressions and throwing the ball to any spot. Still, skipping throw to McKenzie like last Sunday happened - McKenzie himself explained that Allen's read progression on that play is left to right but McKenzie got open right away. What I think that Beasley is still better than McKenzie in the mental part is that he knows when to "slow" play sometimes to get open right at the moment when your QB's read is onto you - not an excuse for Allen to rush the throw resulting skipping it short).

[TheConsigliere]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

You can cover your bet since there is no doubt Poyer got blown last night.

[Ingtar33]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

Still, skipping throw to McKenzie like last Sunday happened - McKenzie himself explained that Allen's read progression on that play is left to right but McKenzie got open right away. What I think that Beasley is still better than McKenzie in the mental part is that he knows when to "slow" play sometimes to get open right at the moment when your QB's read is onto you - not an excuse for Allen to rush the throw resulting skipping it short).

i think JA handling the ball 80 times out of 90 plays in 100 degree heat had more to skipping the ball to McKenzie then anything else. I bet his legs were jelly by that point in the game.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Poyer on his 4th down INT - "blown coverage"

How? the Bills would have declined the penalty

Doh


Nevermind