Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

[Woodman]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

Bolden is everything we should have been able to do with Edmunds. It’s frustrating to watch how well KC can use an athletic LB v our struggles.

Bingo!!!!!!!

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

The youth WTF do they know?

Not much.

[Woodman]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

KC is lucky to be down only 10.

fumble TD was huge.

[Woodman]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

That's the defintion of inconclusive.

yes it was.

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

fumble TD was huge.

So was the bs penalty at the end “should have played better”

[Woodman]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

So was the bs penalty at the end “should have played better”

gotta play well enough to win.

step on their throats and finish em off I always say.

[TacklingDummy]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

Bullcrap.

The refs decided that game. Badly. With a ****ty, terrible bad, bad call.

“Should have played better”

[sahlensguy]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

fumble TD was huge.

The false start led up to it.

[Woodman]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

The false start led up to it.

Absolutely it changed the game.

Normally that bulldozer line pushes that runner for the 1st down ........ possession is maintained and the game's history changes completely ..... the smallest mistakes.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/super-bowl-2023-eagles-james-bradberry-admits-officials-made-correct-call-on-crucial-late-holding-penalty/

Hard to complain about that penalty at the end when the player who committed the penalty fully admits he held and that it was the correct call. If he disagreed with the holding penalty he would have just not commented on it.

[Woodman]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/s...lding-penalty/

Hard to complain about that penalty at the end when the player who committed the penalty fully admits he held and that it was the correct call. If he disagreed with the holding penalty he would have just not commented on it.

Just a dumb ass they all give a tug.

No more a foul as twenty others not called.

A bad call regardless.

[Historian]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

It wasn't PI jmo.

And you would be correct, Woodsie.

If one feels the need to call a foul there, it should be a defensive holding foul, five yards, first down.

I don't think that changes the outcome of the game, but at least it takes away the smell of favoritism.

I thought a more egregious call was the reversal of the Philly catch in the first half.

Game turned from there, IMO.

One thing the last few SBs have showed (I think) is the need for big, fast, hard hitting linebackers.

Other than Milano, our group is weak.

[Historian]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

and yes, I believe mahomes was exaggerating the limp.

I do too, and in fact I said to my wife, "This is all part of the theater. Now I know KC will win the game"

The last two SBs have essentially been decided by ****ty refereeing.

Or is it?

I'm to the point where I believe all this crap is fixed.

These aren't players.

They're actors.

[imbondz]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

The only time that was called all game. Yeah right.

[Woodman]

Re: Eagles vs Chiefs Super Bowl 57

And you would be correct, Woodsie.

If one feels the need to call a foul there, it should be a defensive holding foul, five yards, first down.

I don't think that changes the outcome of the game, but at least it takes away the smell of favoritism.

I thought a more egregious call was the reversal of the Philly catch in the first half.

Game turned from there, IMO.

One thing the last few SBs have showed (I think) is the need for big, fast, hard hitting linebackers.

Other than Milano, our group is weak.

Could not agree more.