Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

[kgun12]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

$10 million isn’t going to replace Diggs, Davis, Morse, White, Poyer and Hyde. There is simply no way to go into next season with talent that is equal to or better than last season, and we already know last season’s team was behind several others in the AFC in terms of talent.

Come on man, do you really believe this of are you just playing the angry poster? What you understand, they already replace everyone but Diggs and I’m not sure it’s going to be hard to replace his production from the last half of the season and playoffs. White hasn’t really played the last couple years, Poyer and Hyde slowed down noticeably. We will miss David’s blocking but his receiving number are also easily replaced. They will get a DT, DE, an O-lineman, and a WR in this draft.

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Come on man, do you really believe this of are you just playing the angry poster? What you understand, they already replace everyone but Diggs and I’m not sure it’s going to be hard to replace his production from the last half of the season and playoffs. White hasn’t really played the last couple years, Poyer and Hyde slowed down noticeably. We will miss David’s blocking but his receiving number are also easily replaced. They will get a DT, DE, an O-lineman, and a WR in this draft.

You’re insane if you believe they already replaced everyone but Diggs. And all the teams that are ahead of us in talent get to draft to fill their holes too. I don’t know why everyone refuses to acknowledge that reality.

[kgun12]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

You’re insane if you believe they already replaced everyone but Diggs. And all the teams that are ahead of us in talent get to draft to fill their holes too. I don’t know why everyone refuses to acknowledge that reality.

Nope, you just live in a dark place. So tell me who isn’t an upgrade to all of the elders the Bills released?

Yes, I fully expect them to draft a S, CB, and both lines, but it was time for the old guys to go.

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Nope, you just live in a dark place. So tell me who isn’t an upgrade to all of the elders the Bills released?

Yes, I fully expect them to draft a S, CB, and both lines, but it was time for the old guys to go.

So far, we’ve only replaced them with their backups. If their backups were better, they should have been on the field last year.

And that’s a LOT of holes to fill in one draft.

[sukie]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Hard to play a backup when you have an overpriced veteran starter living off reputation. Happens in nearly all team sports.

[Chet]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Lots of wishful thinking itt.

Remember, these are the Buffalo Bills. One step forward, two steps back

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Hard to play a backup when you have an overpriced veteran starter living off reputation. Happens in nearly all team sports.

So the assumption is that we had not one, not two, but SIX backups who were better than the starters, sitting on the bench due to the reputation of the starters? If that's the case, every coach should be fired.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Yes, you can.

It's been done many times in the last 20 years.

[sukie]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

So the assumption is that we had not one, not two, but SIX backups who were better than the starters, sitting on the bench due to the reputation of the starters? If that's the case, every coach should be fired.

Tre. No longer a starter. Didn’t play basically 2 seasons
Hyde No longer a starter. Couldn’t stay on field
Gabe Davis. Starter ? He sucks
Morse. His replacement… we shall see. His best years were behind him.

are you weeping for Poyer?

- - - Updated - - -

Ya know how one becomes an all pro starter? One needs to start.

[kscdogbillsfan1221]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Hard to play a backup when you have an overpriced veteran starter living off reputation. Happens in nearly all team sports.

agreed. case in point.

terell bernard behind tremaine edmunds.

[Mad Max]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

agreed. case in point.

terell bernard behind tremaine edmunds.

You’re baits gonna catch a big old guppy

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Tre. No longer a starter. Didn’t play basically 2 seasons
Hyde No longer a starter. Couldn’t stay on field
Gabe Davis. Starter ? He sucks
Morse. His replacement… we shall see. His best years were behind him.

are you weeping for Poyer?

- - - Updated - - -

Ya know how one becomes an all pro starter? One needs to start.

Exactly.

The only position of any concern right now besides WR is Safety. Rapp could easily be the next Poyer or Hyde (He could also suck, but you get the point).

I don't know how anyone who followed the team last year can honestly be upset about any of the players lost this offseason.

If you want to be upset that they didn't wait until after the draft to trade Diggs, I can understand that.

Other than that, like Sukie said, all the guys that left are either on the downslope of their career, or got highly over paid by another team, or both.

[sukie]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

For Milanos money… who wants Edmunds back? I kinda like our backup LBs that panned out.

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

For Milanos money… who wants Edmunds back? I kinda like our backup LBs that panned out.

And you think that's just going to keep panning out with everyone we lost? That every backup we have is better than an all pro starter? Ok...

[OpIv37]

Re: Can you win a Super Bowl without a great #1 WR?

Exactly.

The only position of any concern right now besides WR is Safety. Rapp could easily be the next Poyer or Hyde (He could also suck, but you get the point).

I don't know how anyone who followed the team last year can honestly be upset about any of the players lost this offseason.

If you want to be upset that they didn't wait until after the draft to trade Diggs, I can understand that.

Other than that, like Sukie said, all the guys that left are either on the downslope of their career, or got highly over paid by another team, or both.

EVERYONE should be upset, not so much that we lost guys but that we're trying to replace ALL of them with completely unproven backups. But hey, it worked ONCE with Edmunds, so no need to be concerned, right?

It's one thing to get rid of players who are clearly declining, but it's another thing to just expect all their inexperienced backups to come in and play at the same level.