PDA

View Full Version : So we what if we don't get one of the top 5 WR



Mad Max
04-22-2008, 09:05 PM
Who's gonna be available on day two that we should consider?

This is a guy Mcshay likes for the mid rounds.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/todd-mcshays-nfl-draft-sleeper-wr-jerome-simpson/3757141355

List any you know of.

VeggieMan14
04-22-2008, 09:28 PM
Who's gonna be available on day two that we should consider?

This is a guy Mcshay likes for the mid rounds.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/todd-mcshays-nfl-draft-sleeper-wr-jerome-simpson/3757141355

List any you know of. I've been sayin Jerome Simpson from Coastal Carolina for a while that he would be a good late round pick

X-Era
04-22-2008, 09:28 PM
Who's gonna be available on day two that we should consider?

This is a guy Mcshay likes for the mid rounds.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/todd-mcshays-nfl-draft-sleeper-wr-jerome-simpson/3757141355

List any you know of.

Royal
Simpson
Monk

None look to be the player that any of the top four are, but each has bigtime upside

VeggieMan14
04-22-2008, 09:29 PM
I've been sayin Jerome Simpson from Coastal Carolina for a while that he would be a good late round pick wow shoulda watched the video first

PECKERWOOD
04-22-2008, 09:29 PM
Man, I'm not so sold on the WR's this year. I really hope we land a TE or even two this year because it's a really strong class. Carlson, Davis, Keller or Kellen would do. Sweed, Hardy and Kelly are my 3 favorite WR's at this moment in time. ( ask me 5 seconds from now and my list will change. :up: )

VeggieMan14
04-22-2008, 09:29 PM
Royal
Simpson
Monk

None look to be the player that any of the top four are, but each has bigtime upside Monk is huge isn't he like 6'6''-6'7''?

X-Era
04-22-2008, 09:35 PM
Monk is huge isn't he like 6'6''-6'7''?

Hes 6' 4 1/4" 215, 4.42 40.

VeggieMan14
04-22-2008, 09:38 PM
Hes 6' 4 1/4" 215, 4.42 40. wow ive definately seen some exaggerations but still he's taall and fast. id take him late

Mitchy moo
04-22-2008, 10:41 PM
Pout?

Buckets
04-23-2008, 08:13 AM
Jordy Nelson

Pinkerton Security
04-23-2008, 08:19 AM
if we dont get one of the top 5 wr's we're f'd in the a.

perhaps top 8 or 10. then we're f'd for sure

TigerJ
04-23-2008, 09:02 AM
Receivers with some size that could be had later are maybe Jordy Nelson (I say maybe because he could go in round 2, 3 at the latest) Monk, Keenan Burton, Paul Hubbard, Simpson (all in the mid-rounds) Ernie Wheelwright, Steve Johnson, Urutia, Chaz Schillens, Jaison Williams and others are all late round and free agent possibilities. There is, however, usually a reason why some players are picked early and others not.

ddaryl
04-23-2008, 10:59 AM
We're in real bad shape if we don't get a startable WR in the draft. Day 2 guys usually take 2-4 years to get it at the NFL level. If they ever get it.

Johnny Bugmenot
04-23-2008, 12:06 PM
So what if they don't get a top WR? I'll tell you what. This team shouldn't even try and field a team if that's what's going to happen. They're going to get a top WR in this draft or else they're going to lose more games, and the people of Buffalo aren't able to take much more of this garbage and neither will the people of Toronto.

This team cannot win without a new top wide receiver. Don't give me any of those "day 2" projects, either. This team needs to win, and they need to win now.

raphael120
04-23-2008, 12:47 PM
With our offense as pathetic as it's been in the past, I dont think we have the luxury of hoping a later round WR will make us all that much better.

The Answer
04-23-2008, 12:48 PM
Who's gonna be available on day two that we should consider?

This is a guy Mcshay likes for the mid rounds.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/todd-mcshays-nfl-draft-sleeper-wr-jerome-simpson/3757141355

List any you know of.

Unless a blockbuster trade is in the works for an established veteran receiver than there's no way we don't take a WR (or 2 of them) on day one - especially considering that Evans will be unhappy and crying once his lover JP Loserman is traded or released this summer.

~The Answer

Michael82
04-23-2008, 02:16 PM
With our offense as pathetic as it's been in the past, I dont think we have the luxury of hoping a later round WR will make us all that much better.
EXACTLY! and if we are stupid enough to take a CB with our first pick, we better trade up to get a WR or we will miss out on all the top ones that could help our offense and start for us now.

The Jokeman
04-23-2008, 02:31 PM
EXACTLY! and if we are stupid enough to take a CB with our first pick, we better trade up to get a WR or we will miss out on all the top ones that could help our offense and start for us now.
We could draft in Round 4 and start him. True he might not be as good as the guy we take in Round 1 but don't think trading up is wise. Instead stay where we are and acquire more players as doubt any WR we select this year will make a significant impact in year one. As to me regardless of where we draft a WR it's still going to take three years for the guy to completely develop. To me a quality CB might contribute earlier then a WR and why could see drafting one sooner then later.

EDS
04-23-2008, 02:48 PM
Just food for thought, but historically aren't there more top wide receivers drafted outside the top 15 picks in the draft (R. Moss, T. Owens, M. Harrison, S. Smith, C. Johnson, R. Wayne, M. Colston) then in the top 15 (L. Fitzgerald, T. Holt, B. Edwards, P. Burress)?