I don't care about his attitude; I don't care about his rumored lateness. The Bills initially didn't either; they knew he had issues when they agreed to trade for him and pay him $5 million a year. He could've helped us out big-time in the redzone today, yet we didn't play him one damn play. With Watkins out there at about 50%, there was no reason at all not to give that guy a chance to make something happen. Inexcusable.
Mike Williams
Collapse
X
-
Re: Mike Williams
Originally posted by Thurmal View PostHe could've helped us out big-time in the redzone today, yet we didn't play him one damn play.
364 net yards, 13 points. That's one FG for every 84 yards. Other than he Jets game we net 3 points for every 61 yards, that's not even 15 points for 300 yards.
You can't win games by scoring TDs primarily from outside the red zone.http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/sho...s-haters/page3
Post #46
Originally posted by Yasgur's Farm(Moderator) My name's Max Yasgur, and I approve of this post.Originally Posted by pmoon6
The idea that you "won't settle" presumes that you have some kind of control. Delusional thinking at best for a supposed fan of a spectators' sport. Your way to deal with it is to constantly ***** and denigrate any move, any result concerning the team even if it's positive because you don't want your whittle feewings hurt again. It's a protection mechanism.
You shroud your childish approach in a vale of pompous, intellectual garbage in an attempt to look smart and "real". You over-analyze even minute points and manipulate statistics to fit your negative view of the team. Again, to feel good about yourself and to protect from getting hurt.
Of course, the criticisms are obviously from someone who has no understanding of the team concept or what it takes to excel at athletics.
The true "realist" understands that they have no control of what happens on the field or behind the closed doors at One Bills' Drive, so they do the prudent thing for a spectator. They enjoy the games on Sunday with family and friends, cheer for their team and realize that it's just entertainment.
"I was an integral part in the drafting process of EJ Manuel," Whaley said Thursday on NFL Network's Total Access. "I was the person that handled the draft process and setting up the board."
"We are committed. I want you to believe me when I say that," Whaley said of building around the second-year quarterback, per The Buffalo News. "I always tell you guys that I'll never say never because I don't want to paint myself in a corner, but when I do say something, I do it and I mean it and I try to fulfill it."
"We believe the addition of Sammy is going to be instant impact, not only to our quarterback, but to what our offensive coordinator can come up with game-plan wise and how defenses attack us," Whaley said.
Whaley on EJ Manuel: "We think we got a gem in this guy." (2:30)
"And as Mark says, if in three years maybe he's not [our quarterback of the future], then I'll be sitting there saying 'hey guys', .... anybody got a job for me?" - Doug Whaley
Comment
-
-
Re: Mike Williams
Marrone brought him in, then shoved him into his dog house after the Texans game. It's clear that Hogan has something going with Orton, makes sense since they were on the 2nd team together, but once you get into Marrone's dog house you're not getting out unless he has no other option, see Urbik.
Goodwin is glass, he can never finish a game, another wasted selection.
Comment
-
-
Re: Mike Williams
Originally posted by Mr. Pink View PostDidn't Marrone have issues with Williams at Syracuse?
I know Williams quit before he was kicked off the team Marrone's first year there.COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.LecterWe were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Comment
-
Comment