Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 53

Thread: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

  1. #1
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace X-Era's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Corning, New York, United States
    Posts
    27,670
    Thanks
    1,006
    Thanked 2,040 Times in 1,212 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    83

    How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Check the stats guys.

    The two best LT's are probably Orlando Pace and Walter Jones. Yet, BOTH Bulger and Hasselbeck have been sacked more times than JP!!

    Hell, STL has Pace on one end and Alex Barron on the other.

    I think every team in the league probably feels like they could do better on the OL and maybe this stat shows that.

    Add in that we have the #1 rusher in the league for 2 straight weeks. How can we be clamoring for an upgrade at OL?

    Based on what? Penalties? yes, but what team hasnt had them that has a great o-line?


  2. #2
    Registered User Forward_Lateral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The Great White North
    Posts
    29,894
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 8,130 Times in 4,307 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    118

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Because the Bills only have ONE backup guard on their Depth Chart.

  3. #3
    Retired - On Several Levels Night Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Last Depot
    Posts
    33,117
    Thanks
    9,387
    Thanked 14,240 Times in 7,618 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    126

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    How about OL that pancake the opposition in the running game ? That's the true measure.

    Sacks aren't the proper measure. You could stick 5 HOF OL in front of Bledsoe and he'd still get sacked 50 times.

    We still need a couple bigger, stronger OL to replace Chris V. and Gandy.
    Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

  4. #4
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace X-Era's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Corning, New York, United States
    Posts
    27,670
    Thanks
    1,006
    Thanked 2,040 Times in 1,212 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    83

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by Forward_Lateral
    Because the Bills only have ONE backup guard on their Depth Chart.
    THAT I will buy!

    But that doesnt have to come from the 1st round

  5. #5
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace X-Era's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Corning, New York, United States
    Posts
    27,670
    Thanks
    1,006
    Thanked 2,040 Times in 1,212 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    83

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by Night Train
    How about OL that pancake the opposition in the running game ? That's the true measure.

    Sacks aren't the proper measure. You could stick 5 HOF OL in front of Bledsoe and he'd still get sacked 50 times.

    We still need a couple bigger, stronger OL to replace Chris V. and Gandy.
    But if we arent looking at sacks and we have the #1 rusher in the league, whats the problem again?

    Im not saying its a perfect line. Im only asking if anyoen can point to another teams line that is perfect. Denver has the lightest OL in the league. The average weight is well under 300 pounds.

    Villarial is getting long in the tooth, so we may need a replacement. But I think we are about to see that we already have one in Duke Preston.

  6. #6
    Registered User Ron Burgundy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,154
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by jp-era
    But if we arent looking at sacks and we have the #1 rusher in the league, whats the problem again?
    Yards per carry. Third down conversions. Penalties. Quarterback pressures.

    Your argument is flawed 'cause you're leaving out data. Our o-line definitely needs some tweaking.

  7. #7
    Legendary Zoner ICE74129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,796
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    This OL still doesn't have a QUALITY LT or RG. Then there is depth which is lacking as well.

    I don't care how well we do or don't do this year, if Marv doesn't go out and land a top notch LT and RG, we aren't getting much better than we are now.

  8. #8
    Registered User BillsFever21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    In a state located in the USA
    Posts
    9,067
    Thanks
    2,276
    Thanked 1,155 Times in 770 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    39

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    If Losman wasn't so mobile this OL would've given up at least 16 sacks by now.

    And while McGahee is leading the league in rushing his YPC is very low. He's probably up there towards the front in attempts also. Plus there are many good RB's that have already had their bye week and McGahee has a game on them.

    Also, McGahee only has 1 TD. The OL has gotten manhandled inside the 10 yard line and couldn't get him any room to score. It took a penalty on the Vikings to even get the TD on Sunday.

    We also haven't been able to convert on short yardage in obvious running situation because our OL is getting knocked on their ass by the DL. This OL is improved over last year but far from not needing anymore help.

  9. #9
    Registered User BillsFever21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    In a state located in the USA
    Posts
    9,067
    Thanks
    2,276
    Thanked 1,155 Times in 770 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    39

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Just as I thought. McGahee leads the league in attempts and he's 26th in YPC. His YPC is only 3.9. This OL still needs a lot of work.

  10. #10
    Registered User THATHURMANATOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Kenmore
    Posts
    69,112
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 1,017 Times in 512 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    257

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by jp-era
    Check the stats guys.

    The two best LT's are probably Orlando Pace and Walter Jones. Yet, BOTH Bulger and Hasselbeck have been sacked more times than JP!!

    Hell, STL has Pace on one end and Alex Barron on the other.

    I think every team in the league probably feels like they could do better on the OL and maybe this stat shows that.

    Add in that we have the #1 rusher in the league for 2 straight weeks. How can we be clamoring for an upgrade at OL?

    Based on what? Penalties? yes, but what team hasnt had them that has a great o-line?
    How can you think we don't need more help on the Oline?

  11. #11
    Registered User Saratoga Slim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,153
    Thanks
    422
    Thanked 1,193 Times in 627 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    29

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by BillsFever21

    Also, McGahee only has 1 TD. The OL has gotten manhandled inside the 10 yard line and couldn't get him any room to score. It took a penalty on the Vikings to even get the TD on Sunday.

    We also haven't been able to convert on short yardage in obvious running situation because our OL is getting knocked on their ass by the DL. This OL is improved over last year but far from not needing anymore help.
    Agreed. You can tell a good run blocking offensive line when you see a push on short yardage situations. While the line this year is definately playing better than last, we still struggle to run on third and short and near the goal line. Even McGahee's touchdown last week was more his effort than the line's success in clearing a path. I'm happy with the improvement, and don't fault Levy and Co. for making the offseason decisions that they did in light of the numerous holes we had to fill, but I'm really hoping this next free agent period and draft land us a solid RG, perhaps an upgrade at LT, and some depth.
    Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?

  12. #12
    Legendary Zoner Earthquake Enyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    On the Boilermaker Special
    Posts
    27,521
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by THATHURMANATOR
    How can you think we don't need more help on the Oline?
    Exactly.

    After the Bear game, everyone will think we need 4 new starters.

  13. #13
    2020-2023 AFC East Champions! Historian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Upstairs
    Posts
    61,684
    Thanks
    33,027
    Thanked 28,521 Times in 15,599 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    207

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    I don't think you can ever have enough quality O linemen, or defensive backs.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    5,216
    Thanks
    823
    Thanked 972 Times in 578 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by BillsFever21
    Just as I thought. McGahee leads the league in attempts and he's 26th in YPC. His YPC is only 3.9. This OL still needs a lot of work.
    Agreed.

    I really think right guard is a huge problem right now because the team has had very little success running up the middle. A stud right guard would go a long way to opening up some daylight for Willis. Fortunately, I think this something that is correctable in free agency or the draft (although they may have to draft a left tackle since they are not readily available in free agency).

  15. #15
    Registered User THATHURMANATOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Kenmore
    Posts
    69,112
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 1,017 Times in 512 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    257

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    This is the same guy clamoring to trade for Roy Williams even though we are 4deep with Solid receivers.....

  16. #16
    Registered User THATHURMANATOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Kenmore
    Posts
    69,112
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 1,017 Times in 512 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    257

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by Earthquake Enyart
    Exactly.

    After the Bear game, everyone will think we need 4 new starters.
    Unfortunatly you may be right?

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    DC now, grew up in Wellsville, NY... lived in Baltimore for a while
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    21

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Was I the only one who saw Duke Preston get manhandled by Williams on his first play in replacing Villarial?

    I know it's tough to come in off the bench cold... but I didn't like what I saw there. He's gonna have a long day against Tommie Harris (who from what I saw on Monday night is a monster)
    Kent Hull for Hall of Fame



  18. #18
    Too sober for this... mysticsoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    rochester, ny
    Posts
    31,439
    Thanks
    6,961
    Thanked 3,210 Times in 2,111 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    93

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Preston had some bad plays, but he wasn't a total disaster. Then again, that's really no difference than Villarial - who tends to have a few bad plays a game. Preston is not far from Villarials' level of play. That being said, I wish we had someone better than both. I can only hope that Merz develops into the Guard that we need.

    In either case, we will likely be drafting or via FA, getting another Guard next year as Villarial's career comes to an end in Buffalo.

  19. #19
    Registered User TigerJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Gates, NY
    Posts
    22,575
    Thanks
    858
    Thanked 3,564 Times in 2,153 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    90

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    The life of a GM is to always be trying to improve every aspect of his football team. While the offensive line is better than what it was a year ago, it's still not worthy of being labeled a strength. It's a little too soon to tell where the weakest points are in the line, probably no one among the starters, except perhaps Peters, is much better than the average lineman at that position. Villarial looks to be on his last legs, and I'll be a little surprised if he's back next season.
    I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

    I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

  20. #20
    Registered User Lexwhat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,926
    Thanks
    76
    Thanked 316 Times in 156 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Quote Originally Posted by jp-era
    Check the stats guys.

    The two best LT's are probably Orlando Pace and Walter Jones. Yet, BOTH Bulger and Hasselbeck have been sacked more times than JP!!

    Hell, STL has Pace on one end and Alex Barron on the other.

    I think every team in the league probably feels like they could do better on the OL and maybe this stat shows that.

    Add in that we have the #1 rusher in the league for 2 straight weeks. How can we be clamoring for an upgrade at OL?

    Based on what? Penalties? yes, but what team hasnt had them that has a great o-line?

    Isn't Pace injured and not playing?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •