Tatonka I suppose you are right.... I have mixed feelings on the issue which is evident in my arguments. I did say that I believe race is a factor in this case, which may or may not be true. I was always open to other peoples views on this topic and after reading several responses I can agree with many of them. I still maintain however that I personally have trouble seeing the difference between hunting for SPORT (not food) and the dog fighting ring. Again, in the end its a dead animal that was killed for a purpose other than necessity.Originally Posted by Tatonka
I suppose in a way I was playing devils advocate on this issue, not to stir up trouble, but to get a variety of opinions and arguments from other people. To clarify I DO NOT condone what he did, i guess it just bothers me that things like this can be avoided before they happen if the powers that be actually cared to take care of the root problems instead of just dealing with the bi-products. Again Im not trying to excuse his actions, he should be punished for committing an act he knew was illegal and more than that the level of cruelty involved. I am a pet owner, i have cats and I have had several dogs so I dont like what he did anymore than anyone else. Although I sounded like I was convinced with my arguments when I started the thread but that was only to get a variety of opinions on the subject since like I said have mixed feelings. To sum up, I still think that hunting should be banned because its just as cruel as dog fighting, Vick should certainly be punished, race is most likely not an issue.
Should Vick be banned from the NFL for life for this though?