1-year deal too. He wants to have a good year then get paid
1-year deal too. He wants to have a good year then get paid
This means WR day 1. I like it, we will be better with Sweed or Kelly in there.
I've wanted Hackett ALL ALONG, before FA.
F'n sign him, they NEED an improvement besides a rookie. I cant fathom they wouldnt sign ANY of these #2 WR's.
Thank God that saga is over.
Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
Because they are #3s and/or injury prone?Originally Posted by patmoran2006
It would be nice, but they are not great upgrades.
Originally Posted by mysticsoto
Hackett would be a HUGE upgrade if healthy, and considering our offense blows balls, it would be nice to take a chance or two.
Yes, our defense has gotten better.. Now its time to do something, ANYTHING to help the offense, besides just counting on rookies.
**** Johnson.. I've wanted Hackett since before FA started; this kid can play.
Why would they look at Johnson and not look at Hackett?
link?
You're right, I am a coward! I haven't any courage at all. I even scare myself.
Because Hackett, much like our offense blows balls.Originally Posted by patmoran2006
Originally Posted by patmoran2006
Enjoy playing with the old legs Issac Bruce and the flop Ashley Lelie. That team now has 3 #2s and no #1.
does this mean all the BJ threads are done?
I would not say Hackett blows balls, but his injury past makes it a risk.
Would I like him here? Sure. But it is not a crisis if he is not brought in.
What would bother me more is if they do not sign a CB, because then there is a problem at #11 as to what position to take. They need to sign James now so CB is not as much of glaring need.
Pat, as of right now I see nothing on any main site saying this... without a link, I think this should be moved to Spam and titled "rumor"Originally Posted by patmoran2006
I'll take Hackett for league minimum.Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
rumor?Originally Posted by Mr. Miyagi
If/when a link shows up, I will remove the word rumor. There has been too many of these.
I will leave it here, since Pat is not the type to make **** up.
I'm looking and haven't seen ****. Only link I have seen is from the same site that had us already signing him
I was guilty of floating a few myself. I think the standard should be that we add rumor to the title until we have a link. However, even then we have to consider the source too as far as the link goes.Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
That said, I have a feeling we find out where Johnson is going today.Originally Posted by patmoran2006
Both Hackett and James would be good to sign and shouldn't blow the bank. That would give us options and free us up with our picks!!!Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
GR8, Hackett does not blow! He's actually pretty good if he can stay healthy. But even if he only lasts half a season with us, that's half a season that a rookie can use to get acclimated and develop before he is thrown in...Like Pat, I don't understand why the FO is not even bringing him in to check him out. I do hear that there is concern about his work ethic - so maybe that's why.
let's bring back robert royal. we need a big body that can go over the middle...