Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

  1. #1
    kernowboy
    Guest

    Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Firstly we resign Bob Saunders last season's DL coach who has previously worked almost exclusively with 4-3 lines and left the Packers because they moved to the 3-4

    Secondly, Giff Smith has been recruited as a defensive assistant. No mention at all of the term outside linebacker coach.

    Might it be that both Gailey and Nix have realised that there would be more of an upheval than initially thought in shifting to a 3-4 defence and that it seems that this defence is once again seemingly losing popularity with the overall success of 4-3 defensive teams getting to the SuperBowl.

    It would not surprise me that the DC might be happy running either formation which I think would be the best outcome for the Bills.
    Last edited by kernowboy; 01-27-2010 at 02:10 PM.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,642
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    19

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    That's actually a good question? Watch it be Bates when it's all said and done.

  3. #3
    Formerly MARCELL DAREUS POWER, now posting as DANNY BATTEN POWER NOT THE DUDE...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    8,826
    Thanks
    556
    Thanked 414 Times in 316 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    hasnt it already been reported that buffalo is going to a 34 defense?

  4. #4
    Legendary Zoner psubills62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    11,295
    Thanks
    470
    Thanked 762 Times in 473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    42

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by kernowboy
    Firstly we resign Bob Saunders last season's DL coach who has previously worked almost exclusively with 4-3 lines and left the Packers because they are moved to the 3-4
    I agree with you that people are jumping to conclusions. And a message board poster saying Giff Smith is coaching our OLB's isn't exactly a reliable source.

    However, that's not why Sanders left the Packers. Sanders was fired. IMO it was fairly unjust, as his defense had numerous injuries and thus performed poorly.
    "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
    - Nicholas Cummings

  5. #5
    kernowboy
    Guest

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by JOHN DELLAPELLE
    hasnt it already been reported that buffalo is going to a 34 defense?
    I think assumed rather than reported

  6. #6
    Registered User BoyILuvLoznStupidly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fairport, NY
    Posts
    1,514
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    18

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by JOHN DELLAPELLE
    hasnt it already been reported that buffalo is going to a 34 defense?
    no it's all been speculation

  7. #7
    Just because my name is dicknoze,it doesn't mean I have balls in my mouth Dicknoze69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    1,224
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    24

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Sanders and Giff's titles are very vague and leave room for interpretation about what their actual roles will be. Yesterday I was fairly convinced we were going to a 3-4. Today's announcement leaves me a little less convinced, but I still think it's likely.
    __________________

    God give me style and give me grace
    God put a smile upon my face

  8. #8
    kernowboy
    Guest

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    I actually think we will wait until free agency and the draft occur before making a final decision.

    I think Nix will want to draft players not simply because they fit a system but because they are the best available.

    I don't think he would pass on a 4-3 LE simply to reach for someone because they are more suited to the 3-4

  9. #9
    Registered User BoyILuvLoznStupidly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fairport, NY
    Posts
    1,514
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    18

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    IMO i would say no. Why would you want to rebuild both sides of the ball. Especially after Buddy said he thought we are close to winning. It makes more sense to add one or two pieces to the defensive side of the ball and focus more on the offensive side where we have been atrocious.

  10. #10
    kernowboy
    Guest

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by BoyILuvLoznStupidly
    IMO i would say no. Why would you want to rebuild both sides of the ball. Especially after Buddy said he thought we are close to winning. It makes more sense to add one or two pieces to the defensive side of the ball and focus more on the offensive side where we have been atrocious.
    I completely agree. Some of our young LBs like Harris and Palmer seem unsuited to the 3-4.

    Our existing defence automatically becomes better with an improved offence as they have more rest time

  11. #11
    Registered User BoyILuvLoznStupidly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fairport, NY
    Posts
    1,514
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    18

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by kernowboy
    I completely agree. Some of our young LBs like Harris and Palmer seem unsuited to the 3-4.

    Our existing defence automatically becomes better with an improved offence as they have more rest time
    Exactly, we would have no depth on the D side of the ball if we moved to a 34. I think they will add a LB to replace Ellison and then turn their focus to the O.

  12. #12
    Dude's Little Ignorant Crony RockStar36's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    24,761
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    152

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by BoyILuvLoznStupidly
    no it's all been speculation
    No, it was definitely reported today that the Bills are switching to the 3-4.

  13. #13
    Registered User BoyILuvLoznStupidly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fairport, NY
    Posts
    1,514
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    18

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by RockStar36
    No, it was definitely reported today that the Bills are switching to the 3-4.
    By who?



  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,642
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    19

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    That's true about Sanders, he was fired as the DC. There was no way he would take a demotion.

  15. #15
    kernowboy
    Guest

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by WeAreMarshawn23
    That's actually a good question? Watch it be Bates when it's all said and done.
    Sanders served under Bates in Miami when Bates ran the 4-3 using Bowens and Gardner in the middle

  16. #16
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    I reported it.

    And my report was BEFORE the GT was announced as a new coach.

    And I still stand by it.. and if i'm wrong, I'll take the heat that comes with it.


    Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

    Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

  17. #17
    My battery is low and it's getting dark. ParanoidAndroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    St. John, USVI
    Posts
    16,830
    Thanks
    2,983
    Thanked 5,714 Times in 3,432 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    61

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    I would be willing to bet that they will run a hybrid from a 3-4 base. We at least know that the cover-2 is dead in Buffalo.

  18. #18
    kernowboy
    Guest

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Or we go with a Bates/Jim Johnson 4-3 with two big DTs, more man coverage, and blitzing speed from the Ends and LBs

  19. #19
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    i was told by the same source that told me George Catavolos was returning that we were moving onto a 3-4 defense, so I will stand by it and get flamed if Bates or Sanders or a guy like that is the new DC

  20. #20
    Dude's Little Ignorant Crony RockStar36's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    24,761
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    152

    Re: Are we really moving to a 3-4 defence?

    Quote Originally Posted by BoyILuvLoznStupidly
    By who?


    He already told you, but here is the link.

    http://www.buffalosportsdaily.com/20...o-3-4-defense/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •