Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Special Ed. Teams melt down (LA venting)

  1. #1
    Registered User LABillsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    I can't tell with all the smog
    Posts
    4,418
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37

    Special Ed. Teams melt down (LA venting)

    17 points given up. How on earth do you let a team run back 2 kick offs for TD's and block a punt in one game. Mediocre teams don't allow that in a season. No excuse can be good enough to justify the outcome. The game Drew, Travis and even the lines had were more than I expected but leave it to the
    Special Ed'ers to grab defeat out of the jaws of victory. I know there will be growing pains this year, I expect that, but there is a difference between growing pains and shear inability. The lack of depth on the Bills was shown today by the horrendous play of the coverage teams, I wanna see heads roll.

  2. #2
    Hello, I'm Mike and I'm a Bills fan.
    Administrator Emeritus
    northernbillfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Shadowy Man on a Shadowy Planet
    Posts
    27,551
    Thanks
    385
    Thanked 321 Times in 128 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    168
    :angry:
    When I die, please don't let my wife sell my camera equipment for what I told her I paid for it.



  3. #3
    Tapit: All the Way to the Derby BillsMan80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    In an Ice Hockey Rink Somewhere in the USA!!!!
    Posts
    2,605
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27
    NBF, bring back the old custom title...because we need some speshul teamz
    The NTRA...GO BABY GO!!!!!!!
    THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT WILLIS!!!!!!!!!!! Touchdown Wills McGahee!!!!!

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    239
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    22
    I didnt see tha game because they decided to show the Colts-Jafs game here in Alabama .. But I have to agree with LA .. how do you give up 2 kickoffs for TD's? I can just imagine the faces at the Stadium .. had to be total disbelief. Obviously a huge shakeup is need on Special teams .. what a sad way to lose a game that we should have won.

  5. #5
    Registered User casdhf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    20% Warning Level
    Posts
    17,542
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked 730 Times in 363 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    99
    Shoulda been there....I could see the coverage over-persuing the whole time especially in OT
    Quote Originally Posted by BillsZone Mod
    cas,

    I'm just letting you know that you have been given 2 points for telling Wys AKA Mark to kill himself.

    BillsZone Mod


  6. #6
    The Vanilla admin shelby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    48,489
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    205
    kick some LA...who's gettin fired first?!?!?


  7. #7
    Registered User LABillsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    I can't tell with all the smog
    Posts
    4,418
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37
    At this point I don't care. BUT I do have a couple questions though.

    I was in favor of keeping Morris and Bryson in case something happened to Henry, but neither touched the ball in the game which meant they were fresh and unbruised and sould be focused on their one and only duty. They both have speed and toughness, So WHY with all that going for them, did they get BURNED BAD on those run backs????

    Did we improve with Denman and Tuitele?
    I've said it before and I'll say it again, I don't repeat myself.

  8. #8
    1-800-SAD-GOAT Ð's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Where the people look good, where the music is loud
    Posts
    17,319
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    56
    Rooks gotta learn that slacking on ST's = points on the board.

    GW will run the ST's into the ground next week @ practice, guaranteed.

  9. #9
    Youboty can hope venis2k1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    western mass
    Posts
    4,621
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 62 Times in 34 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    32
    I learned how to cover someone on special teams in Pee Wee league. Special teams suck, they sucked back in the Music City Miricle, They Sucked in the preseason, and they sucked today.

  10. #10
    Registered User LABillsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    I can't tell with all the smog
    Posts
    4,418
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37
    I know venis, They do, (Although I did force and recover a fumble on punt coverage in High School) but that's how 2nd and 3rd string guys make the team and move up. Hard work and effort.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    255
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    I didn't see the game here in TN, but read that
    (1) it was the same guy on the runback who burned us -- why did we kick to this guy twice? and
    (2) the Jets used a wedge but it was apparently not a center wedge, it was a wedge on one side only, and this formation evidently confused our ST defense -- twice.

    After the first debacle, why didn't our HC assign two reliable first-string players to ST as insurance against another disaster today?

    I saw a similar occurrence watching the Titans game today -- Titans ST blew a play which led to a Philly TD -- then Coach Fisher assigned a couple of premier players to ST to be SURE that didn't happen again today. There is no player on any team too good to play ST and throw a block or make a tackle when needed.

  12. #12
    1-800-SAD-GOAT Ð's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Where the people look good, where the music is loud
    Posts
    17,319
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    56
    lanes, boys, lanes

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    255
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    OK -- lanes -- but what if the opposition is, as apparently the Jets were, limiting themselves to one side of the field on the return. Is that what confused our guys on the inactive side -- should they stay in their lanes or go over and help?

  14. #14
    Registered User Sabre Ally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    The Zoo
    Posts
    11,682
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    48
    Originally posted by BillsMan80
    NBF, bring back the old custom title...because we need some speshul teamz
    Doh! There's the answer right there. It's all my fault for changing nbf's title.

  15. #15
    Drew's my hero!
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,491
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked 62 Times in 42 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26
    Originally posted by Rebecky
    OK -- lanes -- but what if the opposition is, as apparently the Jets were, limiting themselves to one side of the field on the return. Is that what confused our guys on the inactive side -- should they stay in their lanes or go over and help?
    It was a directionaly kick, the coverage wanted him on that side both times. The just f@cked up their assignment and flowed to where the ball had been. If just one of them want straight at Morton they would not have tackled him but would have stopped the return.

  16. #16
    in charge of you
    Administrator Emeritus
    lordofgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    higher than you
    Posts
    48,416
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19 Times in 8 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    140
    More than guys being out of their lanes, the problem was with missed tackles. They had him going east-west on boith kickoffs, but he cut it back and no one wanted to tackle. I don't think it's a weakness in schemes, it just boils down to the basic fundamentals of tackling.






    <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com/index.php?page=buzzbite&amp;BB_id=119588">Do you like me?</a> | <a href="http://www.buzzdash.com">BuzzDash polls</a>


  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    255
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0
    It looked like a pretty good return scheme -- I finally saw the replays. Have the whole team cover the runner with a sideline wedge, then after most of the coverage is eliminated, open a hole and let him break to the opposite side which is, by that time, nearly vacant.

    If your coverage on the quiet side of the field crosses over to help, it leaves half the field vacant for the runner. If they stay in their lanes, the wedge could just carry along the sidelines all the way to the end zone because we'd have what, 7 tackles trying to get through 10 blockers? And 4 guys standing in their lanes in the middle and opposite side of the field doing nothing?

    This does not look like an easy formation to defend against to me -- what am I missing?

  18. #18
    Registered User LABillsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    I can't tell with all the smog
    Posts
    4,418
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37
    I don't know what you're missing but teams have used directional kicks for decades, it's nothing new. How they melted down twice is for only the Gods to know.

  19. #19
    Drew's my hero!
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,491
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked 62 Times in 42 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26
    Originally posted by Rebecky
    It looked like a pretty good return scheme -- I finally saw the replays. Have the whole team cover the runner with a sideline wedge, then after most of the coverage is eliminated, open a hole and let him break to the opposite side which is, by that time, nearly vacant.

    If your coverage on the quiet side of the field crosses over to help, it leaves half the field vacant for the runner. If they stay in their lanes, the wedge could just carry along the sidelines all the way to the end zone because we'd have what, 7 tackles trying to get through 10 blockers? And 4 guys standing in their lanes in the middle and opposite side of the field doing nothing?

    This does not look like an easy formation to defend against to me -- what am I missing?
    The whole point is that the ball carrier cannot run through blockers who are being pushed back, then whoever's lane is open just makes the easy tackle on the contained runner. What you see in the replay is everyone making ***** attempts at tackling and trying to "free lance" away from their assignment, they all want to be heros. Only the gunner is supposed to be a hero.

    Aside from the two blowups, we were pretty solid on the kick coverage, and last year we were excellent. I think throwing in a starter or two will make enough a difference and light a bit of a fire under our regular ST clowns. I bet L. Fletcher would blow up his man and nix the return.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •