I am not a college guy by any means but when I have seen him play he looks slow and not a great pass rush presents. What do you guys think I know a lot o ppl want us to pick him
I am not a college guy by any means but when I have seen him play he looks slow and not a great pass rush presents. What do you guys think I know a lot o ppl want us to pick him
I'll be interested in his combine times
I don't think he's going to light up anybody's 40 clock.
YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
terell suggs
or should we call him T sizzle
anyway he ran slow at combine and he is a beast
so.......
Slow? That's your knock?
I'll take Upshaw at #10 without a doubt.
LT all the way.
[
Yeah, because LT was the biggest problem area on the team last year. LOL.Originally Posted by dannyek71
Last edited by better days; 02-18-2012 at 04:37 PM.
LT was a big problem after Bell went down and he is a Free Agent. Even then Bell got beat a decent amount but early on Fitz was getting the ball out quickly.Originally Posted by better days
The LT spot needs plenty of help, the sacks allowed stat is a somewhat misleading with that.
COMING SOON...
Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
Do you think the lack of protection at LT by Buffalo was a bigger problem than the failure to get to opposing teams QBs?Originally Posted by DraftBoy
Pass rush may be the most glaring need, but part of that is attributed to the dumbass DC. LT is a huge need, unless Hairston can step up really quick, and I know there are some that believe he won't be able to unless it's on the right side.Originally Posted by better days
Well, Wanstadt has said the Bills need to put pressure on the QB. They need players to do that. The defense especially a pass rush is a much bigger need than the OL.Originally Posted by YardRat
Just watch who the Bills draft early........it won't be a LT.
I'm not sure of any player who has great success in the SEC who is slow.
"The best things to happen to Michigan Football have come from Ohio." - Chris Spielman
I don't think Nix and Co. will give two thoughts about taking a LT at #10. They know their most glaring hole is getting to the QB.
Buffalo was near the league leaders in least sacks allowed. Not sure why you would look to "fix" that "hole" when you have craters on the other side of the ball.
Not disagreeing that they will, and should, go pass rush with their top pick if one is there but also don't want to downplay the need for a OT.Originally Posted by better days
Well, IMO, people calling for a LT in the 1st rnd are OVERPLAYING that need. I would take a CB or WR before a LT in the 1st. Both of those positions are a greater need than LT. If Bell is resigned, the Bills will be fine at LT. If they don't sign Bell, they can make do with who is on the team & a mid rnd pick.Originally Posted by YardRat
It is much harder to find anyone to rush the passer with consistency in the mid rnds than it is an OT.
Last edited by better days; 02-19-2012 at 09:15 AM.
I think they are 1a and 1b in terms of need. I dont really value one higher than the other because both are so big.Originally Posted by better days
Well, I TOTALLY disagree with you. I think Bell gets resigned, but even if not, the Bills can make due. DE & OLB are the two positions of greatest need. After that CB & WR are a greater need than LT IMO.Originally Posted by DraftBoy
If they don't draft a pass rusher, who will do that? Merriman? Moats?
Last edited by better days; 02-19-2012 at 10:28 AM.
Please lay off the hooch sir.Originally Posted by dannyek71