Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: The rules shouldn't change

  1. #1
    My IQ Test results came back negative BillsOwnAll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    5,502
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 752 Times in 359 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    The rules shouldn't change

    All this talk about how they can't call that pi at he end of the game cause its the end of the game . Why donpeoplw think the rules should change at the end of the game? Pi is pi first quarter or last play. It shouldn't be everything goes just cause it's an important play. We want consistenty.


    What's yor thoughts on callin the game different as the game goes on.?

  2. Post thanked by:

    CleveSteve (02-04-2013),The Toe Show (02-04-2013)

  3. #2
    Registered User superbills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    West Seneca
    Posts
    1,170
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 54 Times in 36 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    24

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    When you stop posting as this guy, then we'll have a conversation
    Last edited by superbills; 02-04-2013 at 10:30 AM.
    "The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."
    Ronald Reagan
    40th president of US (1911 - 2004)

  4. #3
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,194
    Thanks
    1,272
    Thanked 3,595 Times in 1,857 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    It wasn't bad enough to call, that's my stance. That late, for the refs to be able to change the outcome of the game, it better be a beating for them to call pass interference. Good no call, in my opinion.

  5. #4
    Registered User MikeInRoch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    10,446
    Thanks
    909
    Thanked 1,880 Times in 913 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    48

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    The rules should be the rules, from play one of the pre-season through the end of the Super Bowl. None of this "I'm changing the rules when it's important" BS.
    "'Clean up your room.', 'Stand up straight.', 'Pick up your feet.', 'Take it like a man.', 'Be nice to your sister.', 'Don't mix beer and wine, ever.'. Oh yeah, 'Don't drive on the railroad track.'"

    "Eh, Phil. That's one I happen to agree with."

  6. Post thanked by:

    CleveSteve (02-04-2013)

  7. #5
    Pinkerton's son Pinkerton Security's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 959 Times in 522 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    If the pass were a little better it might have been called. The ball landed a couple yards OOB

  8. Post thanked by:

    jlgarsh (02-04-2013),YardRat (02-05-2013)

  9. #6
    Skoobasaurus-Rex Skooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Naples FL
    Posts
    22,284
    Thanks
    14,920
    Thanked 5,219 Times in 3,688 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    Sabres have a penalty called on them with ~2 minutes left in every other game.

  10. Post thanked by:

    ServoBillieves (02-05-2013)

  11. #7
    Registered User RedEyE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    24,661
    Thanks
    938
    Thanked 882 Times in 493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    111

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    From my perspective Crabtree initiated first contact before the ball was thrown. Sorry for the crappy video the NFL highlight machine is down: (see :52 seconds) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW7qWnMFgW0

    Per the NFL rule book: The restriction for the passing team starts with the snap. The restriction on the defensive team starts when the ball leaves the passer’s hand. Both restrictions end when the ball is touched by anyone.

    IMO this is a good no call. Contact was initiated by the WR before the ball was thrown. DB retaliated with a push of his own once ball was in the air. Then the receiver pushes off to find separation from DB.

    IMO, if a flag was called it would have been offensive for initiating contact in an attempt to push off and race to the corner post.

    I could even see an argument to hand out offsetting penalties.

    But there is no way in hell that Smith should have been penalized for this without Crabtree also receiving a penalty.

    I like the no call.

  12. Post thanked by:

    better days (02-05-2013),imbondz (02-04-2013),Lone Stranger (02-04-2013),YardRat (02-05-2013)

  13. #8
    Pinkerton's son Pinkerton Security's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 959 Times in 522 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    Quote Originally Posted by RedEyE View Post
    From my perspective Crabtree initiated first contact before the ball was thrown. Sorry for the crappy video the NFL highlight machine is down: (see :52 seconds) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW7qWnMFgW0

    Per the NFL rule book: The restriction for the passing team starts with the snap. The restriction on the defensive team starts when the ball leaves the passer’s hand. Both restrictions end when the ball is touched by anyone.

    IMO this is a good no call. Contact was initiated by the WR before the ball was thrown. DB retaliated with a push of his own once ball was in the air. Then the receiver pushes off to find separation from DB.

    IMO, if a flag was called it would have been offensive for initiating contact in an attempt to push off and race to the corner post.

    I could even see an argument to hand out offsetting penalties.

    But there is no way in hell that Smith should have been penalized for this without Crabtree also receiving a penalty.

    I like the no call.
    You failed to take into account the fact that the ball was in the air, and the DB still had a firm grasp on the WR. Im glad they didnt call it but the DB definitely impeded him a bit after the ball was in the air.

  14. #9
    This is great, and all I've done is enter my name! THRILLHO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    1,574
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 394 Times in 208 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    20

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    If anything is to be changed it should be the most ridiculous penalty in the books; running into the kicker.
    True fans want wins, not draft picks.

  15. #10
    Registered User RedEyE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    24,661
    Thanks
    938
    Thanked 882 Times in 493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    111

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    With the WR initiating first contact (pushing off) prior to the ball being in the air he also is violating the pass interference rule. So I fail to see how then Smith is the bad guy in all of this? The DBs response was warranted. Again, I could see an argument for off setting penalties, but I don't buy it that the Ravens DB is solely at fault.

  16. #11
    Dances With Buffaloes Ingtar33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    15,465
    Thanks
    1,203
    Thanked 4,377 Times in 2,101 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    65

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    The contact was initiated by Crabtree under 5 yards from the line (which is allowed), that said, there was a clear hold with the defending pulling hard with both hands on the WR's jersey, more then 5 yards down field with the football in the air.

    That's clear cut pass interference.

    And I'll add this to it. Without that pass interference, Crabtree probably could make a solid play on that football, as he was about 18 inches away from it. Without that hold, he likely gets a hand on that football. So by every definition, and even spirit of the rule... that was pass interference. As to Crabtree pushing off... if it worked (as in he was actually able to get separation because of it) it would have been offensive pass interference. However, Smith had such a death grip on Crabtree at that moment, no advantage was gained.
    Last edited by Ingtar33; 02-04-2013 at 11:37 AM.
    My wife told me that if I had a dollar for every girl who found me unattractive, girls would find me VERY attractive.

    MY WIFE SAID THAT!!!

  17. Post thanked by:

    BillsFanInNM (02-04-2013),CleveSteve (02-04-2013),MikeInRoch (02-04-2013),Skooby (02-04-2013)

  18. #12
    Registered User RedEyE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    24,661
    Thanks
    938
    Thanked 882 Times in 493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    111

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    That 5 yard use of hands rule applies to the defender and not the receiver: http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/useofhands

    Exception: An eligible receiver is considered to be an obstructing opponent ONLY to a point five yards beyond the line of scrimmage unless the player who receives the snap clearly demonstrates no further intention to pass the ball. Within this five-yard zone, a defensive player may chuck an eligible player in front of him. A defensive player is allowed to maintain continuous and unbroken contact within the five-yard zone until a point when the receiver is even with the defender. The defensive player cannot use his hands or arms to push from behind, hang onto, or encircle an eligible receiver in a manner that restricts movement as the play develops. Beyond this five-yard limitation, a defender may use his hands or arms ONLY to defend or protect himself against impending contact caused by a receiver. In such reaction, the defender may not contact a receiver who attempts to take a path to evade him.

    Therefore referring back to the offensive pass interference prior to th ball being in the air:

    Offensive pass interference rules apply from the time the ball is snapped until the ball is touched.
    Actions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to:

    (a) Blocking downfield by an offensive player prior to the ball being touched.

    (b) Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating a separation in an attempt to catch a pass.

    (c) Driving through a defender who has established a position on the field.


    Still - The play was 4th and 5 from the 5. Crabtree initiated the contact just before the goal line, carrying them past the 5 yard mark, prior to the throw, AND the contact did not break until they were deep into the endzone. So even if the 5 yard cushion did apply to the receiver, Crabtree clearly broke that rule once over the goal line.

  19. Post thanked by:

    better days (02-05-2013),Lone Stranger (02-04-2013),ServoBillieves (02-05-2013)

  20. #13
    Registered User Mouldsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    5,661
    Thanks
    4,280
    Thanked 2,545 Times in 1,633 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    24

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    Quote Originally Posted by THRILLHO View Post
    If anything is to be changed it should be the most ridiculous penalty in the books; running into the kicker.
    THIS

  21. #14
    Dances With Buffaloes Ingtar33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    15,465
    Thanks
    1,203
    Thanked 4,377 Times in 2,101 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    65

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    Quote Originally Posted by RedEyE View Post
    (b)Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating a separation in an attempt to catch a pass.
    no separation was created. the defender wrapped his arms around him, and got a death grip on his jersey. Then was dragged 2 yards before falling to the ground.

    Since no separation was created by the contact, no offensive pass interference occurred. However, defensive pass interference most certainly happened.

  22. #15
    Registered User RedEyE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    24,661
    Thanks
    938
    Thanked 882 Times in 493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    111

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    Quote Originally Posted by Ingtar33 View Post
    no separation was created. the defender wrapped his arms around him, and got a death grip on his jersey. Then was dragged 2 yards before falling to the ground.

    Since no separation was created by the contact, no offensive pass interference occurred. However, defensive pass interference most certainly happened.
    With the utmost respect, the defensive pass interference most likely would NOT have occurred had the WR not tried to shove himself free from the defender.

    Like I said before, I can see an argument for offsetting penalties, but Smith was definitely interfered with as well.

    Either way there was obviously enough contact between the two to not instigate a flag. This could have been something the officials had been seeing between the two all game long.

  23. #16
    Dances With Buffaloes Ingtar33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    15,465
    Thanks
    1,203
    Thanked 4,377 Times in 2,101 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    65

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    Quote Originally Posted by RedEyE View Post
    With the utmost respect, the defensive pass interference most likely would NOT have occurred had the WR not tried to shove himself free from the defender.

    Like I said before, I can see an argument for offsetting penalties, but Smith was definitely interfered with as well.

    Either way there was obviously enough contact between the two to not instigate a flag. This could have been something the officials had been seeing between the two all game long.
    I can see a flag on both of them... it would have been hard to throw on Crabtree, but I could see it. However, I have seen the flag thrown on what Smith did too many times to count. It is simply pass interference, no ifs ands or buts about it. Frankly, I think 49ers fans got a taste of what it meant to be a Colts fan circa 2002-2006 whenever they played the patriots... that was pretty standard pass defense for the pats back then.

  24. #17
    Democrats are people too imbondz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    specifically located in the Milky Way
    Posts
    26,041
    Thanks
    5,048
    Thanked 4,008 Times in 2,188 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    94

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    All i know is GREAT NO CALL!!!! I despise the 49ers couldn't have been happier.
    My faith doesn’t make me perfect, it makes me forgiven.


  25. #18
    Insufferable prick and perpetual crybaby Meathead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Outer space
    Posts
    21,349
    Thanks
    3,655
    Thanked 3,785 Times in 2,047 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    78

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    by not calling what appears to be an obvious defensive penalty on an ultra critical play that would have resulted in at least an automatic first down if not the ball at the one isnt the ref already inserting himself in the game?
    One set of rules for all in the beloved community

  26. Post thanked by:

    EricStratton (02-04-2013)

  27. #19
    Democrats are people too imbondz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    specifically located in the Milky Way
    Posts
    26,041
    Thanks
    5,048
    Thanked 4,008 Times in 2,188 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    94

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    the refs are always part of the game, most calls are judgment calls.

  28. Post thanked by:

    better days (02-05-2013)

  29. #20
    Legendary Zoner
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    21,476
    Thanks
    7,701
    Thanked 9,841 Times in 6,258 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: The rules shouldn't change

    They never called the SF DB for mugging Jones on the 5 yard line in the first half either.

    All in all, I thought the game was fairly called.

  30. Post thanked by:

    better days (02-05-2013),Lone Stranger (02-04-2013),YardRat (02-05-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •