When I look at what the Rams had at the skill positions in 2013, I'm impressed that Bradford was able to put up the numbers he did. They just had nothing. Their go-to guy was Jared Cook for crying out loud and their run game was almost on-existent.
By my count that is now 561 players the Bills are interested in.
Because Sam Bradford is extremely high risk, and it isn't just a free agent tight end. It's a NT, a 4-5Tech DE, possibly a safety and a cornerback, a tight end, a running back, a guard, a tackle, a wide receiver AND a QB. Maybe it would be more palatable if the front office didn't dick around with the defense, but this team is farther away from competing than just a QB, and an over-priced, injury-prone one at that.
Go ahead and trade away multiple picks and put Bradford behind Glenn-Richardson-Woods-Incognio-Henderson and see if he makes it through the preseason. Not a gamble worth taking, IMO.
YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Dr. Who (02-25-2015)
Well, while Stafford is an upgrade over anything on the FA market, the upgrade is not nearly worth the price.
Think of it this way: you have a Geo Metro that barely runs. You upgrade by paying $40,000 for a 2 year old Honda Accord that's been in an accident. Sure, you got a good car, but you paid for a great car and now you can't afford to pay for Internet or replace your 5 year old cell phone. And you never know when something from that accident is going to come back and bite you in the ass.
Upgrading is good. Moderate upgrades at high costs are not.
GvilleBills (02-24-2015),YardRat (02-24-2015)
Why trade for a unanimous All-Whirlpool selection ?
One set of rules for all in the beloved community
Historian (02-25-2015)
None of this makes much sense for the Rams. Yes he's expensive, but the Rams are better off with him than without him. Fisher named him the starter apparently. So he can get onto the field. And it doesn't snow much in St. Louis.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...radford-trade/Originally Posted by PFT
For the money, it would be more practical, maybe, to bring in Hill and Davis and let them compete with Manuel.
Last edited by swiper; 02-24-2015 at 04:52 PM.
The risk to reward with Bradford is, well, very risky.
Kiko thinks we need to do something like this, this is something that everyone would warm up to. Kiko thinks with the moves the front office will potentially make, like Iupati, Clay, or whoever we may bring in, (Kiko saw an article about Frank Gore from Buffalo Rumblings..) that a move like bringing in Bradford would be a very good thing for the Bills.
ublinkwescore (02-25-2015)
Another monumentally stupid idea of epic proportions.
What was it you said the other day about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?
This decade and a half long quest of finding the perfect D hasn't given us a sniff of the playoffs yet.
jimmifli (02-24-2015)
ublinkwescore (02-25-2015)
Thank goodness this is false.
The 7mil might be possible if Bradford re-works his deal pre-trade, but I doubt the Rams would only take a 5th.
In all honesty even without pulling the trigger on Bradford and keeping all of our current picks and assuming $30mil in cap space they are going to be hard-pressed to fill all of the holes adequately anyway, that's one of the reasons it was foolish to create more by hiring Ryan as HC.
It won't happen, it doesn't need to happen, and it better not happen.
"Expect rejection, but expect more to overcome it."
***Marv Levy.***
"Coach Levy is one of the most inspirational people that I have ever known."
***Thurman Thomas.***
"You're not going to find a more classier, down-to-Earth person away from the field than Marv Levy. He's a guy who's pretty much made me what I am today as far as a professional player and a person."
***Jim Kelly***
I'd take him for a 5th rounder and for half his salary. I doubt the Rams and he would do either. So no.
YardRat (03-01-2015)