Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 32 of 32

Thread: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

  1. #21
    Registered User IlluminatusUIUC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago, Killinois
    Posts
    8,966
    Thanks
    3,129
    Thanked 6,165 Times in 3,360 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Miyagi View Post
    Without Wilson they would have no use for a WR.
    They wouldn't have a use for Jimmy Graham either by that rationale. They wouldn't deal Wilson if they didn't think they could replace him, and they would hope that someone they drafted with the 1sts they received could step in.

  2. #22
    Haha...yeah you think so ? Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    20,312
    Thanks
    25,343
    Thanked 16,509 Times in 9,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy View Post
    Seattle has always had tight pockets and have over $9.5 currently available in cap space and a projected $38 million for next year (assuming $150 million cap).

    So here is the issue at hand, the Hawks have 12 starters that are set to become FA's next year;
    Russell Wilson
    Russell Okung
    Jermaine Kearse
    Bruce Irvin
    Brandon Mebane
    Jon Ryan
    Bobby Wagner
    Ricardo Lockette
    JR Sweezy
    Tony McDaniel
    Will Blackmon
    Jeremy Lane

    All of those players are guys they likely want to resign but have to find the money to do it. Giving Wilson $24+ million puts a huge hole in the projected $38 million in cap space. Okung is arguably a Top 10 LT and will get paid a good amount of money. Irvin, Wagner, and Mebane are guys who will also be getting hefty raises.

    Also the Top 6 salaries for the Hawks next year are Richard Sherman, Marshawn Lynch, Cliff Avril, Jimmy Graham, Micheal Bennett, and Earl Thomas. None of those guys are getting reworked imo.

    That's the issue the Hawks find themselves in currently.
    You know, that's why I think megabucks QB's are as much of a curse as a blessing these days. You either decimate your team to keep one, or count on your team to cushion your lack of one. I wonder if you aren't better off with a middling QB on a great team instead of trying to patch together a team around a megabucks one.

    People won't like my saying it, but New England is fortunate to have Brady's lack of greed and a team concept that keeps salaries reasonable, with a solid enough organization to keep them upper level. It's remarkable.

    I'd pass on Wilson, I'm still not sure he isn't the right guy in the right place at the right time with the right team in the right organization.

  3. Post thanked by:

    better days (07-18-2015)

  4. #23
    Peterman Sucks! Mr. Pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    the fifth ring of hell
    Posts
    35,303
    Thanks
    2,755
    Thanked 10,254 Times in 6,469 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    97

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Realistically...

    I don't know if the Bills would have enough to give up to acquire him.

    Seattle, as DB already pointed out, is gonna have quite a few holes next season as they won't have the cap space to bring back everyone even if Wilson is traded or allowed to test FA.

    Those holes will require young cheap talent. Seattle recycles receivers and doesn't care who's on the outside so guys like Watkins and Woods are likely out. Talent on the o-line that's good isn't cheap. D-line talent isn't cheap. LB talent isn't cheap. Secondary talent isn't cheap.

    So realistically you're looking at the Bills being able to offer 1st and 2nd round picks for the next 2 to 3 seasons and I dunno if that would be enough to entice a trade. Although I might be willing to see them bite on Tyrod Taylor as he's a guy of similar skill set that maybe Pete Carroll thinks he could coach him up and get results with playing time.

  5. #24
    Dances With Buffaloes Ingtar33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    15,459
    Thanks
    1,202
    Thanked 4,369 Times in 2,097 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    65

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    I'd give the Hawks whatever they wanted. RW is a good kid, a better QB and that just happens to be the most important position on the football field in the NFL right now.
    My wife told me that if I had a dollar for every girl who found me unattractive, girls would find me VERY attractive.

    MY WIFE SAID THAT!!!

  6. #25
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Miyagi View Post
    Russell Wilson will be demanding a huge contract, upwards of $25 million a year. Seattle is standing back at this point. Not that they would realistically trade him away, but there's a point where it's getting too expensive for them and the right offer would get a deal done. That would likely include a multiple player and draft picks deal.

    We all think that we're a quarterback away from being elite. Which player would you trade along with draft picks for Wilson?
    Nothing

  7. #26
    Registered User yordad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In a WNY bar
    Posts
    11,867
    Thanks
    332
    Thanked 527 Times in 314 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    46

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mace View Post
    People won't like my saying it, but New England is fortunate to have Brady's lack of greed and a team concept that keeps salaries reasonable, with a solid enough organization to keep them upper level. It's remarkable.
    Do you not think for a second NE pays Brady under the table? Seems pretty obvious.
    "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

    "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

    "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

    "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

    "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

  8. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by GreedoII View Post
    2 1sts and Dareus gets it done and sign him to the contract you were going to give Dareus.
    If Seattle tags him, two first rnd picks is the most they can get.

    Dareus is off the table.

  9. #28
    Registered User IlluminatusUIUC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago, Killinois
    Posts
    8,966
    Thanks
    3,129
    Thanked 6,165 Times in 3,360 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by better days View Post
    If Seattle tags him, two first rnd picks is the most they can get.

    Dareus is off the table.
    There is a higher level of franchise tag called an exclusive rights tag that prevents any other team from signing a guy to an offer sheet. It's crazy expensive, so it's only ever used on QBs, like Flacco and Brees. The Hawks would almost certainly use that tag if they were forced to.

  10. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by IlluminatusUIUC View Post
    There is a higher level of franchise tag called an exclusive rights tag that prevents any other team from signing a guy to an offer sheet. It's crazy expensive, so it's only ever used on QBs, like Flacco and Brees. The Hawks would almost certainly use that tag if they were forced to.
    Yeah, as you said though, that is CRAZY expensive.

    The Hawks would be better off signing Wilson to a new contract than to put that tag on him.

  11. #30
    Registered User IlluminatusUIUC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago, Killinois
    Posts
    8,966
    Thanks
    3,129
    Thanked 6,165 Times in 3,360 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    Quote Originally Posted by better days View Post
    Yeah, as you said though, that is CRAZY expensive.

    The Hawks would be better off signing Wilson to a new contract than to put that tag on him.
    Absolutely true but the tag is the last resort to force him to stay. It gives them another 3-4ish months to get a deal done once others have set the market.

    I imagine once either Luck or Wilson signs the other will be right behind.


    Billszone 2013 Prediction Contest winner!

  12. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,717
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 872 Times in 527 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    15

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    The difference between the exclusive and non-exclusive tags isn't that big. This year the non-exclusive tag for QB's would be about $18.5M. The exclusive tag would have been a little less than $20M.

    The question for Seattle is, with Wilson wanting to be the highest-paid QB in the NFL they are looking at funding guarantees between $50M - $60M dollars. That is a big cash outlay, expecially when the guy isn't a free agent yet.

    With Wilson wanting to be paid like he is a free agent already, Seattle is looking at the alternative. They can keep him this year for real short money, about $1.5M. Then, even if they have to exclusive tag him the following 2 years it will be around $20M and $24M. That is $45.5M over the next 3 years, instead of having to fund well over $50M this year just to secure his guarantees.

    Thus, the negotiation. I would expect the team and Wilson will agree on a deal that pays him somewhere between the $45M over the next 3 years the $75M he wants over that same span. I'd expect him to sign a 5-year deal that pays him about $100M to $110M over that span, with guarantees around $45M-$50M.

    Seattle wants to keep Wilson, he is the face of the team. Wilson doesn't want to play this year for $1.5M only to face the tag next year, no matter what he says. They will come to an agreement at some point, this is just the negotiation going on right now.

  13. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,717
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 872 Times in 527 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    15

    Re: Russell Wilson - What would you pay and who would you trade for him?

    BTW, the exclusive tag is the average of the top 5 salaries for the position at the end of free agency this year, or 120% of the prior year salary.

    The non-exclusive tag takes the franchise tag amounts at the position over the last 5 years, then divides them by the total salary cap amount per team over that 5 year period. A rolling 5-year average of how much of the salary cap that position's franchise tag takes up, then takes that percentage of this year's salary cap as the non-exclusive offer amount.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •