You know, that's why I think megabucks QB's are as much of a curse as a blessing these days. You either decimate your team to keep one, or count on your team to cushion your lack of one. I wonder if you aren't better off with a middling QB on a great team instead of trying to patch together a team around a megabucks one.
People won't like my saying it, but New England is fortunate to have Brady's lack of greed and a team concept that keeps salaries reasonable, with a solid enough organization to keep them upper level. It's remarkable.
I'd pass on Wilson, I'm still not sure he isn't the right guy in the right place at the right time with the right team in the right organization.
better days (07-18-2015)
Realistically...
I don't know if the Bills would have enough to give up to acquire him.
Seattle, as DB already pointed out, is gonna have quite a few holes next season as they won't have the cap space to bring back everyone even if Wilson is traded or allowed to test FA.
Those holes will require young cheap talent. Seattle recycles receivers and doesn't care who's on the outside so guys like Watkins and Woods are likely out. Talent on the o-line that's good isn't cheap. D-line talent isn't cheap. LB talent isn't cheap. Secondary talent isn't cheap.
So realistically you're looking at the Bills being able to offer 1st and 2nd round picks for the next 2 to 3 seasons and I dunno if that would be enough to entice a trade. Although I might be willing to see them bite on Tyrod Taylor as he's a guy of similar skill set that maybe Pete Carroll thinks he could coach him up and get results with playing time.
I'd give the Hawks whatever they wanted. RW is a good kid, a better QB and that just happens to be the most important position on the football field in the NFL right now.
My wife told me that if I had a dollar for every girl who found me unattractive, girls would find me VERY attractive.
MY WIFE SAID THAT!!!
"Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad
"I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad
"Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad
"Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad
"I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
There is a higher level of franchise tag called an exclusive rights tag that prevents any other team from signing a guy to an offer sheet. It's crazy expensive, so it's only ever used on QBs, like Flacco and Brees. The Hawks would almost certainly use that tag if they were forced to.
Billszone 2013 Prediction Contest winner!
The difference between the exclusive and non-exclusive tags isn't that big. This year the non-exclusive tag for QB's would be about $18.5M. The exclusive tag would have been a little less than $20M.
The question for Seattle is, with Wilson wanting to be the highest-paid QB in the NFL they are looking at funding guarantees between $50M - $60M dollars. That is a big cash outlay, expecially when the guy isn't a free agent yet.
With Wilson wanting to be paid like he is a free agent already, Seattle is looking at the alternative. They can keep him this year for real short money, about $1.5M. Then, even if they have to exclusive tag him the following 2 years it will be around $20M and $24M. That is $45.5M over the next 3 years, instead of having to fund well over $50M this year just to secure his guarantees.
Thus, the negotiation. I would expect the team and Wilson will agree on a deal that pays him somewhere between the $45M over the next 3 years the $75M he wants over that same span. I'd expect him to sign a 5-year deal that pays him about $100M to $110M over that span, with guarantees around $45M-$50M.
Seattle wants to keep Wilson, he is the face of the team. Wilson doesn't want to play this year for $1.5M only to face the tag next year, no matter what he says. They will come to an agreement at some point, this is just the negotiation going on right now.
BTW, the exclusive tag is the average of the top 5 salaries for the position at the end of free agency this year, or 120% of the prior year salary.
The non-exclusive tag takes the franchise tag amounts at the position over the last 5 years, then divides them by the total salary cap amount per team over that 5 year period. A rolling 5-year average of how much of the salary cap that position's franchise tag takes up, then takes that percentage of this year's salary cap as the non-exclusive offer amount.