Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 44

Thread: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

  1. #1
    We play to win the game! BuffaloBlitz83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,754
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 848 Times in 501 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    This has to be one of the lowest in nfl for a starter. I saw his career average is 53%. Diggs Career catch rate is 70% and Beasely career is 71%.

  2. #2
    Registered User Forward_Lateral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The Great White North
    Posts
    29,870
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 8,112 Times in 4,296 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    118

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    The NFL avg, according to stat muse, was 63% last year.

    Now, I'm not sure if this is catches in relation to targets, or catches in relation to balls that hit their hands.

  3. #3
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    65,577
    Thanks
    5,653
    Thanked 7,684 Times in 6,224 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    183

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Do any of those percentages reflect when the QB overthrows or throws the pass away?
    1) Ari
    2) @ Mia
    3) Jack
    4) @ Balt
    5) @ Houston
    6) @ Jets
    7) Tenn
    8) @ Seat
    9) Mia
    10) @ Colts
    11) KC
    12) Bye
    13) SF
    14) @ LAR
    15) @ Det
    16) Pats
    17) Jets
    18) @ Pats


  4. #4
    We play to win the game! BuffaloBlitz83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,754
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 848 Times in 501 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by Woodman View Post
    Do any of those percentages reflect when the QB overthrows or throws the pass away?
    Catchable targets I believe

  5. #5
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    65,577
    Thanks
    5,653
    Thanked 7,684 Times in 6,224 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    183

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by BuffaloBlitz83 View Post
    Catchable targets I believe
    So basically it's a drops number.

    I know he's capable of better numbers.

    I don't recall if he had any injury issues.

    This is his contract year so we can expect better numbers.

  6. #6
    Unreachable Douche
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    71,721
    Thanks
    9,826
    Thanked 6,943 Times in 4,386 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    204

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Dropping the TD in the endzone vs Miami and the 70 yard bomb vs the Jets that hit him in the face did not help.

    Bills would have had the bye if he catches either one of those.

  7. Post thanked by:

    Historian (01-26-2023),Mad Bomber (01-28-2023),notacon (01-26-2023),The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023)

  8. #7
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    21,455
    Thanks
    4,522
    Thanked 9,212 Times in 5,935 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    I said year 1 he’d be out of football by 2024.

    peeps were all over me. Truth is I just took the average 5 year career for an NFL player and came up with 2024 for Gabe.

    One good wide open KC playoff game doth not make a career. If he’s cheap then keep him but he isnt getting a new contract here. Maybe Daboll will make me wrong and sign him as a free agent next offseason

  9. #8
    Registered User kgun12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,307
    Thanks
    5,827
    Thanked 1,953 Times in 1,222 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    But it’s all Josh’s fault!
    Retired Air Traffic Controller
    USAF VETERAN
    DAV

  10. Post thanked by:

    The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023)

  11. #9
    Acid Douching Asswipe OpIv37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    101,151
    Thanks
    16,111
    Thanked 26,376 Times in 13,772 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    285

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    WR's were supposed to be a strength but really weren't. Crowder got hurt early. McKenzie is meh. Shakir looked like a rookie.

    The biggest disappointment was Davis. In 2021, he clearly improved over the course of the season and it looked like that 4 TD game against the Chiefs was his coming out party. Then, in 2022, he was awful.

    Diggs is still great, but beyond him, it's pretty average.

  12. Post thanked by:

    notacon (01-26-2023),The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023)

  13. #10
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    21,455
    Thanks
    4,522
    Thanked 9,212 Times in 5,935 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by OpIv37 View Post
    WR's were supposed to be a strength but really weren't. Crowder got hurt early. McKenzie is meh. Shakir looked like a rookie.

    The biggest disappointment was Davis. In 2021, he clearly improved over the course of the season and it looked like that 4 TD game against the Chiefs was his coming out party. Then, in 2022, he was awful.

    Diggs is still great, but beyond him, it's pretty average.
    Which team(s) do you consider average and let’s compare WR 2-4

  14. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,131
    Thanks
    1,188
    Thanked 1,157 Times in 749 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    30

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by kgun12 View Post
    But it’s all Josh’s fault!
    Can’t fiqure that statement out.
    ‘This team is 7-10 without Josh with multiple qb’s injured behind that o-line.

  15. #12
    Registered User notacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    32,876
    Thanks
    24,836
    Thanked 11,769 Times in 7,813 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    88

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Opi is right. Davis was the biggest disappointment. He is not even close to a viable and reliable #2 WR.

    He is better suited #3 or #4.

    The Bills led the league in drops (34), and Davis led the team with nine of them.

  16. Post thanked by:

    Mace (01-26-2023),The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023)

  17. #13
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    21,455
    Thanks
    4,522
    Thanked 9,212 Times in 5,935 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by kgun12 View Post
    But it’s all Josh’s fault!
    Took this as sarcastic all the way.

  18. Post thanked by:

    Historian (01-26-2023),k-oneputt (01-26-2023),kgun12 (01-26-2023),The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023)

  19. #14
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    21,455
    Thanks
    4,522
    Thanked 9,212 Times in 5,935 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by notacon View Post
    Opi is right. Davis was the biggest disappointment. He is not even close to a viable and reliable #2 WR.

    He is better suited #3 or #4.

    The Bills led the league in drops (34), and Davis led the team with nine of them.
    I looked at NO Saints

    WR 2 was actually a RB as far as yards and completions

    after that the group was better than Davis McK Shakir

  20. #15
    Registered User kgun12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,307
    Thanks
    5,827
    Thanked 1,953 Times in 1,222 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by sukie View Post
    Took this as sarcastic all the way.
    We have a winner! If it wasn’t for Josh we would we looking at a top 5 draft pick!

  21. Post thanked by:

    k-oneputt (01-26-2023),The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023)

  22. #16
    My battery is low and it's getting dark. ParanoidAndroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    St. John, USVI
    Posts
    16,828
    Thanks
    2,982
    Thanked 5,714 Times in 3,432 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    61

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    I thought the target stat was simply that the receiver was the closest to the ball in the air.

    I was not aware that they had to be "catchable."

    Also, "catchable" is pretty subjective. I don't like subjective data.

    Is there a degree of "catchability?" Like, was it kinda catchable or was it really super easy catchable?

    Wouldn't a catchable ball that isn't caught be tallied as a drop?

    If that is the case, then drops plus catches would equal targets minus passes defensed.

    I think targets that aren't catches can be either inaccurate throws, drops or passes defensed.

  23. #17
    honey pie Typ0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    32,592
    Thanks
    714
    Thanked 1,794 Times in 1,207 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    100

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by OpIv37 View Post
    WR's were supposed to be a strength but really weren't. Crowder got hurt early. McKenzie is meh. Shakir looked like a rookie.

    The biggest disappointment was Davis. In 2021, he clearly improved over the course of the season and it looked like that 4 TD game against the Chiefs was his coming out party. Then, in 2022, he was awful.

    Diggs is still great, but beyond him, it's pretty average.
    I like our WRs but they don't make-up a good squad -- the mix isn't right. We need one guy who is super speed for example. Just give us some blazing speed to spread the defense out more. Give us someone else with size and physicality...

    It feels like we have 5 capable slot receivers .... then we need to go out and get Beasley to 'get the band back together'. Folks, you have to start recognizing the pattern of dysfunction that is happening on our team and stop making excuses for the laisse-faire coaching and lack of direction and discipline.

  24. #18
    My battery is low and it's getting dark. ParanoidAndroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    St. John, USVI
    Posts
    16,828
    Thanks
    2,982
    Thanked 5,714 Times in 3,432 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    61

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Davonte Adams had a 55.6% catch rate according to Lineups (180 targets and 100 catches.)

    Anyone else giving this the side eye?

  25. #19
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    21,455
    Thanks
    4,522
    Thanked 9,212 Times in 5,935 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    Quote Originally Posted by ParanoidAndroid View Post
    I thought the target stat was simply that the receiver was the closest to the ball in the air.

    I was not aware that they had to be "catchable."

    Also, "catchable" is pretty subjective. I don't like subjective data.

    Is there a degree of "catchability?" Like, was it kinda catchable or was it really super easy catchable?

    Wouldn't a catchable ball that isn't caught be tallied as a drop?

    If that is the case, then drops plus catches would equal targets minus passes defensed.

    I think targets that aren't catches can be either inaccurate throws, drops or passes defensed.
    You are overthinking it. Davis dropped a ton. Hands on ball or off chest…

  26. Post thanked by:

    The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023)

  27. #20
    My battery is low and it's getting dark. ParanoidAndroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    St. John, USVI
    Posts
    16,828
    Thanks
    2,982
    Thanked 5,714 Times in 3,432 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    61

    Re: Gabe Davis Catch Rate is Hideous

    No. I'm questioning the stat and the post that alluded to how targets mean the ball was catchable.

    I'm not arguing that Gabe wasn't a disappointment this year.

    He was and he had key drops.

    I simply mean that target % isn't all on the WR.

  28. Post thanked by:

    The last buffalo fan (01-30-2023),YardRat (01-26-2023)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •