No AFC team in the last five years has made it to the SuperBowl without first being beaten by the Dolphins. And since I doubt that we'll beat you in Buffalo in December, here's your chance
No AFC team in the last five years has made it to the SuperBowl without first being beaten by the Dolphins. And since I doubt that we'll beat you in Buffalo in December, here's your chance
Wow... How kind of you to extend such a gracious offer!Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
No AFC team in the last five years has made it to the SuperBowl without first being beaten by the Dolphins. And since I doubt that we'll beat you in Buffalo in December, here's your chance
Sounds tempting, but Buffalo will be the first..
Last 5 years? I thought all you Fish Fans based everything on stats from 1972.
Well gee...considering that some of your Bills brothers were bringing up your pre-merger Championships yesterday, who are you to talk?Originally posted by Aero II
Last 5 years? I thought all you Fish Fans based everything on stats from 1972.
Leads? Yeah, sure. I'll...uh...just check with the boys down at the crimelab. Yeah, they got four more detectives on the case....we're working in shifts!"
Well, that was a hostile response. Who am I to talk? By that, you must put Fish fans that in the same catagory as those Bills fans who did bring up the 64-65 Championships. Anyone can take any statistics and turn them to their advantage. Sounds like you would prefer to live in a world where you are the only one that is heard. If you'd like, I'm sure that we could let you just start your own thread where you can respond to yourself.Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
Well gee...considering that some of your Bills brothers were bringing up your pre-merger Championships yesterday, who are you to talk?
And accusing all Phin fans of living in 1972 was a friendly comment? Actually, I would put Phin fans who talk about '72 in the same class as Bills fans who talk about 64-65, if those fans are using those dates as any kind of indication of present performance. In both instances those conversations are inane. As for not wanting any outside feedback, I saw nothing wrong with the two comments which preceded yours, and treated them accordingly. Bottom line, don't throw out a negative comment and not expect one back. Or do you feel that you're the only one allowed to make ascerbic quips?Originally posted by Aero II
Well, that was a hostile response. Who am I to talk? By that, you must put Fish fans that in the same catagory as those Bills fans who did bring up the 64-65 Championships. Anyone can take any statistics and turn them to their advantage. Sounds like you would prefer to live in a world where you are the only one that is heard. If you'd like, I'm sure that we could let you just start your own thread where you can respond to yourself.
Not at all. Your 72 fins are negative? Most fish fans that I talk to bring up that season with glee to defend their point when it comes to Super Bowls and winning seasons. A post that ends withOriginally posted by PhinPhan1227
And accusing all Phin fans of living in 1972 was a friendly comment? Actually, I would put Phin fans who talk about '72 in the same class as Bills fans who talk about 64-65, if those fans are using those dates as any kind of indication of present performance. In both instances those conversations are inane. As for not wanting any outside feedback, I saw nothing wrong with the two comments which preceded yours, and treated them accordingly. Bottom line, don't throw out a negative comment and not expect one back. Or do you feel that you're the only one allowed to make ascerbic quips?
can in most circumstances be construed as a wish for one not to respond. That is the equivelant to "Shut your mouth, you have no right to respond."Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
who are you to talk?
The exact comment was "I thought all you Fish Fans based everything on stats from 1972." Yes, that's a negative comment. It implies that I'm one of those fans who have to resort to the "we had the only perfect season", comment. And implying that ALL Phin fans make those comments when there are posts from Bills fans referencing the older Championships produced my comment "who are you to talk". That comment is not a declaration of a persons right to respond...it's a declaration of the pot calling the kettle black. And to avoid any further potential miscommunication, I'll break it down..Originally posted by Aero II
Not at all. Your 72 fins are negative? Most fish fans that I talk to bring up that season with glee to defend their point when it comes to Super Bowls and winning seasons. A post that ends with
can in most circumstances be construed as a wish for one not to respond. That is the equivelant to "Shut your mouth, you have no right to respond."
1)You made the comment that all Phin fans base "everything" on the Perfect Season.
2)On this board there are Bills fans who resorted to their 60's era Championships in order to make a point.
3)You are more than welcome to make any comment that doesn't violate the TOS. That's why we're all here afterall. But if I feel that comment is an attack and/or either unjustified or part of a double standard, I reserve the right to respond in kind.
I know you but what am I?
you aren't the homer that posted that on the ESPN board,are you?Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
No AFC team in the last five years has made it to the SuperBowl without first being beaten by the Dolphins. And since I doubt that we'll beat you in Buffalo in December, here's your chance
yeah..i want the BILLS to lose because of that.
Originally Posted by yordad
Nope...just a fan posting some light hearted smack.Originally posted by SABURZFAN
you aren't the homer that posted that on the ESPN board,are you?
yeah..i want the BILLS to lose because of that.
ok Dave.Originally posted by PhinPhan1227
Nope...just a fan posting some light hearted smack.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
