Originally Posted by
TedMock
The lines are the most important part of any team, so if all positions are needed, the lines become most vital by default. Great lines make great QB's, and great RB's, more often than the other way around. Pittsburgh has the best o-line in football, and Seattle isn't far behind, hence the two SB teams. You can point to the QB's, but is either really a "stud?" Rothlisberger is closer to being one than the very average, yet pro-bowl, Hasselback. He is a smart QB, though. NE built a dynasty primarily around the lines, Carolina has had a stud line in recent years, and they have been among the best despite having only one WR, and average RB's. Indy's line played poorly in one game this year, and how did that make Peyton Manning look? He fell apart on the field and at the podium. You can go on and on, but the picture is clear. The old cliche' holds absolutely true in this case; "Games are won and lost in the trenches."