is everett any good???
is he more a blocking TE or offensive one? i never watched him at the U
everett beat kellen winslow jr. in a foot race at the U back when they were both there.
he is a receiving TE.
If healthy will he be our number 1 TE on depth chart?
Originally Posted by STAMPY
Ya. He's battaling Royal for #1.. He should win though
Everett is honestly a little bit of both kinds of WR. Not the most gifted receiver when it comes to receiving but can definitely get the job done. He is also a very solid blocker. Being a "U" fan, going from Shockey to Winslow to him was definitely a step down cause he isn't as falshy as the other two but when you watch his career as a whole he is defintely pretty darn good. He is a better blocker then Winslow but not quite as good a receiver. Not the sharpest route runner either. He will be a nice compliment to the team this season as I know he will beat out Royal for the starting position.
Ryan Withey
Owner/President/GM/Director of Player Personnel
Kansas City Super Deuces
Considering we gave Royal $10 million I would hope HE'S the starter.. OR did we pay $10 million for another backup, just like we did with Josh Reed?
Not that I dont think Everett will get plenty of time, they are two different types of Te.
man.. this kind of ****ing comment is getting so old and played out.. i must have read it 150 times since free agency.
it can only be explained so many ****ing times before it sinks the **** in for some people.
4 years for 10 million isnt **** for money.. and all of the 4 year 10 million dollar deals are back loaded.. if they dont play well, they will be gone and it has cost this team chump change.. so get the **** over it and stop ****ing repeating your seft for **** sakes.. jesus.. so ****ing annoying.
I really like Pat, and everybody have the right to have their own opinnion, but some times, it gets out of his control.
Thanks for the info Mr. T.
The Mexican&
too!!
- Adriano & Emiliano, the next Villa & Zapata. Viva Mexico, cabrones!!! -
i see stars...
First of all, instead of swearing up a storm like a imature TOUGH GUY, why don't you go out and get yourself a CLUE with what you're talking about!
Royal's deal is for FIVE years and not four.. And you have to be totally mental to call his contract a "backloaded" contract.
Bills | Contract update: Royal
signed a five-year contract that includes base salaries of $585,000 (2006), $1.3 million (2007), $1.675 million (2008), $1.525 million (2009) and $1.44 million (2010).
Did I mention he got a $2.5 million signing bonus??? For the mathematically challenged, that means his cap figure is a half million for each year of his deal on his SIGNING bonus alone.. And if you think that's a backloaded contract maybe you should re-examine your knowledge on football. A "backloaded" contract is when almost ALL of the money is in the bottom two years of a contract, something along the lines Ryan Denney signed.
So with that contract, YES he BETTER be our starting TE or he was a TOTAL waste of a signing.. $1 million plus cap hit in his FIRST year of the deal is "chump change"?
And the SAME goes for Josh Reed.
Bills | Contract update: J. Reed
signed a four-year contract that includes base salaries of $600,000 (2006), $1.65 million (2007), $1.825 million (2008) and $2.025 million (2009).
He also got a $2 million signing bonus ($500k per year on the cap). His contract is FAR from "backloaded" as well.
So either he starts or is the number three receiver or AGAIN this was a STUPID signing. Is it still CHUMP change to just cut him if he doesnt produce this year, as he's barely done in FOUR years previously. That's $1.5 million cap hit ALONE just to cut him.
that shouldnt be "chump change" to a team that's been playoff-less for six years running.
So either Royal DOES start and Reed DOES at least be the #3 OR they were TWO useless and expensive signings and as you can see they are NOT backloaded contracts.
Maybe next time before one of your childish cuss-tantrums you can actually have an ideal of what you're TALKING about.
is the first year not signifcantly lower than the last year of the contract?
kthanks.
:stfu:
Fight nice, boys.
Are you SERIOUS??? IF that's the case, then about 98% of the contracts in the NFL are "backloaded".
This is a "backloaded" contract, with NO signing Bonus.
Ryan Denney base salaries:
2006: 600k
2007: 1.9 million
2008: 2.3 million
2009: 2.4 million
Robert Royal will make more money in his SECOND and THIRD year than the final year of his contract.
And his contract is "backloaded" exactly HOW again? And once you come up with your answer for that again, you can explain the same to me about Josh Reed's contract.
a million a year is not much - it is easily less than the average player on the team will make (53 players filling out a sal cap of over a hundred mill). Starters will clearly make more than a million on average.
A million a year is PLENTY for a TE if he's NOT the starter.. And in year two of his contract Royal's cap number will be $1.8, a RIDICULOUS amount for a TE if he's not the clear cut starter.
Look, I have no problem with Robert Royal. I am saying I have a HUGE problem giving a guy a multi-million signing bonus and a STARTER-earning contract if he's NOT the starting TE.. And for the record, I NEVER said he would NOT be starting either.
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!
Go Tatonka!! Great posting.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
