Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 64

Thread: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

  1. #1
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,141
    Thanks
    30,719
    Thanked 30,680 Times in 17,521 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/teams/report/BUF/9435918

    Buffalo allowed a whopping 48 pass plays of 20 or more yards, and their last-place rankings on third down and in the red zone were mainly the result of being burned through the air at critical junctures.

    Improving the secondary was a prime consideration this off-season for new general manager Marv Levy and coach Dick Jauron, who added six new players to the mix: free agents Matt Bowen, Kiwaukee Thomas and James Bethea and draft choices Donte Whitner, Ashton Youboty and Ko Simpson.

    They join a list of returning players that includes starting corners Nate Clements and Terrence McGee, free safety Troy Vincent and reserves Jabari Greer, Eric King, Rashad Baker, Rob Lee, Coy Wire and Jim Leonhard.

    The key upgrade is at safety.

    Whitner, the No. 8 overall pick in the draft, will replace Lawyer Milloy at strong safety, giving Buffalo a big hitter with speed and more versatility in implementing schemes. Simpson and Bowen add depth to the position.

    As good as Milloy was, the four-time Pro Bowler had slowed down considerably.

    After analyzing game tape of last season, new Bills defensive coordinator Perry Fewell could sympathize with what predecessor Jerry Gray was up against.

    "As I looked at it last year, Lawyer was always sitting in the box," he said. "Looking at it, that's an eight-man front, maybe they're going to blitz. Now we're interchangeable. (Whitner and Simpson) give us flexibility. Both guys can cover. From a look, disguise (standpoint), we've gotten better with those additions."
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  2. #2
    Retired - On Several Levels Night Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Last Depot
    Posts
    33,117
    Thanks
    9,387
    Thanked 14,240 Times in 7,618 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    126

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    People have to realize that Milloy was NEVER a cover safety in his life. He was a in-the-box safety who played like a 4th LB. He never had speed. When asked to drop back and cover, he was out of his element. He had to go this off-season, once the Cover 2 was announced.

    Whitner and Simpson both have great speed and cover ability. The age of the hybrid safety has arrived.
    Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

  3. #3
    Florida Man John Doe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Anytown, USA
    Posts
    2,515
    Thanks
    798
    Thanked 666 Times in 381 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    28

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    That could be why Clements had to play 10 yards off the reciever that he was covering.

    Nobody had his back.

  4. #4
    Registered User jamze132's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    29,291
    Thanks
    7,848
    Thanked 5,942 Times in 3,562 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    104

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    Quote Originally Posted by John Doe
    That could be why Clements had to play 10 yards off the reciever that he was covering.

    Nobody had his back.
    He won't need to anymore. He can bump the receiver off his route and in turn allow more time for the D-line to get penetration.

  5. #5
    Legendary Zoner ICE74129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,796
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    So instead of getting Bunkley to stop the run and pressure the passer, we get a Safety? Its the LINES that make for a better secondary. But hey, Come september it will all play out.

  6. #6
    Registered User MikeInRoch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    10,446
    Thanks
    909
    Thanked 1,880 Times in 913 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    48

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    Yeah, if we had Bunkley, we could put college players back there and be ok. Because all that really matters is the line.
    "'Clean up your room.', 'Stand up straight.', 'Pick up your feet.', 'Take it like a man.', 'Be nice to your sister.', 'Don't mix beer and wine, ever.'. Oh yeah, 'Don't drive on the railroad track.'"

    "Eh, Phil. That's one I happen to agree with."

  7. #7
    Peterman Sucks! Mr. Pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    the fifth ring of hell
    Posts
    35,303
    Thanks
    2,755
    Thanked 10,254 Times in 6,469 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    97

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    It's a combination of the two....more pass rush and consistent pass rush helps the secondary as does players that fit your system. Thing is with a more consistent pass rush you can have average NFL safeties and be ok. If you don't have an adequate pass rush, you can have steve atwater and ronnie lott back there and it wouldn't matter.

  8. #8
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    I agree with "Fun"..
    It goes hand in hand, a better pass rush makes a secondary better.

    However, I agree with the Whitner pick and this is the biggest reason why:

    I think the Bills will have a better pass rush this year. Tripplett and McCargo in passing downs will be much better than Anderson/Bannon/Adams. They're strength is getting after the quarterback. Couple that with the hopeful/expected return of Spikes and I think our pass rush will be much improved over last year.

    However, the weakness/question is going to be being able to contain the run on first down. No defense can be consistently effective when they're facing 3rd and 2, 10 times per game.

    Whitner from everything I've seen and heard is an outstanding cover safety. Along with a new scheme in the secondary, I think the pass defense will be much improved.

    And again, when teams have to pass, the combo of Triplett and McCargo is an upgrade over the DT's who played here last year.

  9. #9
    All-Pro Zoner Don't Panic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
    Posts
    4,227
    Thanks
    1,092
    Thanked 530 Times in 283 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    28

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    This was my favorite quote from the article:

    "Clements, Buffalo's franchise player, is on board for one more season and likely won't be retained beyond 2006 given the money involved. Youboty has the potential to take his place in the starting lineup, and Simpson will eventually supplant 15-year veteran Vincent, who will be a good mentor."

    Not that I'll be entirely thrilled to see Clements go, but this is a sound plan both logistically and financially and it puts our secondary in a very good position for the long-term. I esspecially like the Vincent-Simpson tutoring situation. Is there a better tutor out there for a young, talented safety?

  10. #10
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    71,579
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked 11,485 Times in 7,099 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    293

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    Quote Originally Posted by ICE74129
    So instead of getting Bunkley to stop the run and pressure the passer, we get a Safety? Its the LINES that make for a better secondary. But hey, Come september it will all play out.
    we got McCargo. What is it you don't understand?

  11. #11
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    In his book, McCargo doesnt even count because he's not going to "start".

    For someone who "knows so much about football", he fails to understand that the Bears and Colts have such effective front fours because they ROTATE their DT's in and out of the game.. Larry Tripplett technically wasn't even a "starter", yet no problem was had when the Bills signed him.

    McCargo is the 2005 Tripplett version of the Colts.. Whomever doesnt see that needs to open up their eyes.

  12. #12
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    71,579
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked 11,485 Times in 7,099 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    293

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    I will take Modraks, Levy's and Jaurons decision over Ice's any day.

  13. #13
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    I just find it partially humorous and partially annoying/hypocritical that I lost count on how many times the "levi jones" name was thrown out there as a "reach" yet when its the BILLS that defy conventional widsom on draft day the pick gets blasted.

    Levi Jones = reach who turned out to be a steal, no?
    Dwight Freeney= reach who turned out to be a steal, no?

    Why not Whitner?

  14. #14
    Registered User acehole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    His moms house
    Posts
    4,876
    Thanks
    245
    Thanked 86 Times in 58 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    52

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    Quote Originally Posted by ICE74129
    So instead of getting Bunkley to stop the run and pressure the passer, we get a Safety? Its the LINES that make for a better secondary. But hey, Come september it will all play out.
    This is very true...but the opposite is also true.....it is called a coverage sack. If nobody is open Shobel and company have more time to get to the qb.

  15. #15
    Registered User GarnOFreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    411
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    20

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    One thing to consider is the cap. we could sign nate long term this year or still use that money to grab a decent priced DE/DT to bolster pass rush ability next year. You have to honest and say we're in a rebuilding process again(at least to a point it will take at least this year and next before we have people set to man the schemes we want to have here). The have addressed the secondary and middle of the defense this year. Next year will probably be aimed at the outside/ pass rush area moreso than this year was(unless we get a diamond in the rough to step up from no where or the Cover 2 turns Kelsay/Denney into a force).

    Still just wondering if the 295 pounders are now what we want to aim for DT players, why not move Denney over to the DT rotation? There was an article(I'm sure most have read) about the suggestion of moving Posey to DE to help the Passrush as well as all the signings we have done of little known players.

    p.s. never realized that Mark Word(DE from Cleve) had 8 sacks in 2003 and 4 more in 2004. was he a situational pass rusher because he was in 16 games both years and the tackle totals were really low.
    "Littlest Bill provides biggest punch"
    Niagara Gazette reports: 'Parrish’s return was more about an electric returner scaring the bejeezus out of would-be tacklers than a group of kindergartners feebly chasing a hamster after someone forgot to latch the cage.'

  16. #16
    Florida Man John Doe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Anytown, USA
    Posts
    2,515
    Thanks
    798
    Thanked 666 Times in 381 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    28

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    Quote Originally Posted by bwbrenton
    I esspecially like the Vincent-Simpson tutoring situation. Is there a better tutor out there for a young, talented safety?
    There may well be. A former all-pro saftey named Dick Jauron.

  17. #17
    All-Pro Zoner feelthepain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    south jersey
    Posts
    4,663
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    You're better off sacking the QB with the front 7 then you are trying to land shut down CB's and probowl S's. I don't understand the thinking of the Bills draft, they could have landed Bunkely with their first pick and Winston Justice with their second and still gotten their latter picks they have now and it would have been a much better balanced draft and they would have had probabbly a top five draft, instead they get players that are good players, but waste so much future potential on players they reached for and overpaid to get.

  18. #18
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE patmoran2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    19,840
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    Is John McCargo a bum who can't get to the quarterback? Am I missing something?

  19. #19
    Florida Man John Doe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Anytown, USA
    Posts
    2,515
    Thanks
    798
    Thanked 666 Times in 381 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    28

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    Quote Originally Posted by feelthepain
    You're better off sacking the QB with the front 7 then you are trying to land shut down CB's and probowl S's. I don't understand the thinking of the Bills draft,
    The Bills drafted 2 quick defensive linemen and signed another in free agency. The pass rush should be a lot better because of it.

    Quote Originally Posted by feelthepain
    ... instead they get players that are good players, but waste so much future potential on players they reached for and overpaid to get.
    The Bill's draft is all about future potential. All the top picks were underclassmen that would probably have been drafted even higher next year if they would have stayed in school.

    I don't get your points at all.

  20. #20
    Registered User BuffaloBillsStampede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    1,230
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    21

    Re: The reason we 'reached' for Whitner

    I have had enough of these dolphin fans coming on here busting our draft when theres is nothing to cheer about. Jason Allen? I wouldn't be that excited over this guy. The reciever you got is ok, but nothing special. We picked up 5!!!!! potential (and most likely) defensive starters within two years. We werent going to win this year so why not build the nucleus of a strong defense this year then maybe focus on the O next year and things are looking way up. Rod Wright is a big sissy ass if you watch any of his games with Texas. He may have been worth a 7th rounder, but there is a reason he slipped to the 7th round.
    SUPER MARIO PLEASE COME TO BUFFALO!!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •